You are enclosed. He is one who enumerates, not enumerates, it is said that he did such-and-such, if the action is triggered by him. If he exposes him to the occurrence of that action, it is said in him, I do. His example is that Zaid hit a lifetime if he hits him, and Zaid hits a lifetime if he makes him hit someone else. The quadripartite act and in the enemy is from the triple action, so the slave is when the divine actions appear in him and what you see in the senses except from him, and it can only be like that God attributed the act to the slave and people attributed the action to the creature, and if the truth made him for that, then it became, then the ratio becomes makes the action to the slave and the ratio of the action makes the action For God, whoever takes care of his sins, guidance is not obligatory upon him, because the principle is the non-action of the servant. The action from the creature to the servant is the appearance of the action from him by choice, intent and directness is a fact witnessed by the sight and the action from the creature from the fact that the right made him to that, so he had like the machine for the subject and the machine is the direct of the action and the action is attributed to the non-machine with vision and reason, so it is said Zaid the hitter and direct to the beating and the one with which the beating takes place Rather, it is the whip, there is no addition. Thus, the actions of the servants are understood as the truth, like the machine for Zaid, the carpenter, the weaver, the tailor, or whatever was. To this extent, the penalty and the assignment are attached to the existence of the choice from the machine, and the principle is the predominant negligence. A text from the Legislator cannot be interpreted. Actions of creatures are predestined by God, and the existence of their causes are all authentically from God, and neither the servant nor the creature has an entry in them by authenticity except in terms of what is the manifestation of them and the manifestation of a passive noun and a passive noun. With his knowledge of the workmanship, he has violated it with such and such, or he asks, I did not disturb it, even though we know that you are aware of it. He says, The machine did not help me to highlight what was in my knowledge. He says, The made is not due to the appearance of his eye, not to the intention of the maker. What was meant was other than Him, if the Creator was the creature, and if He was the Creator, then there is nothing wrong with the craftsmanship, because everything is intended for the lack of a lack of attachment of the will. Unless the shop is in The existence of the place is necessary if the presence of the accident is necessary, so the existence of the offer is from an optional creation and the existence of the place is from a non-voluntary creation and it is not permissible for it to be a compulsion.

[ The world came out in the image of truth ]

For if you did not know matters in terms of their facts, you would not know that the world came out in the image of the truth. The facts in it are linked to the divine realities, and this is a realization that is difficult for him to conceal many things that do not rise with thought or disclosure. He prayed and said that because they followed what displeased God, for the she-camel has a drink, I mean a good she-camel, and you have a drink on a known day. Evidence for a theoretical intellect, and God speaks the truth and He guides the way.

( Access in the chapters on the provisions of the killer s rulings for hunting in the sanctuary and in Ihram )

The ruling on hunting has been presented as a party to this section, and the discussion here is about killing it, not hunting it in the sanctuary, whether or in the solution to his saying: Do not kill the game while you are forbidden. The duty of the proverb, and some of them said that he has a choice between the value and the proverb

[ Killing the game in the sanctuary or in Ihram is a testimony to the hunt ]

Killing hunting is a testimony to hunting, so it is alive and sustenance, because it was killed unjustly in the way of God, because the way of God prohibited it, and the sacred is the attribute of the forbidden and the spot. It is done against the killer, so whoever assaulted you, then attack him in the same way as he attacked you, for hunting is killed, not dead, and the killer is dead, not killed. ?