It is more general and the most comprehensive, and our madhhab does not enter into theirs

[ That something is not repeated in existence ]

Know that whoever knows that divine expansiveness does not necessitate that something in existence is repeated, he knows that coloring is the correct one in the universe, for it is evidence of divine expansiveness. He is one of the people of this position, and he is one of those who are ignorant of God, himself, and the world, so let him weep for himself, for he lost his life, and this ignorance bequeathed them nothing but resemblance, for the difference may be hidden so that he does not feel it. With regard to the color or what was mentioned on it, the Most High said, And they are brought with it resembling one another, that is, one that resembles one another, so he imagines that the second is the same as the first, and it is not like that. Rather, it is the same, and the difference between the two examples is in things that are difficult to perceive by witnessing except for the one who witnessed the truth or verified by watching the chameleon. There is no evidence from the animals that the truth is described as all. A day he is in a matter more virtuous than a chameleon, so there is no attribute in the world and no condition that remains for two times and no image appears twice, and knowledge accompanies the first and the last, so he is the first and the last, the outward and the inward, a color and the identity is united in abundance. M The overseers went, and as for the sect, it affirmed identity and unity and made the face that is from it first, it is the same from it last, outward and inward. In the one, it is not multiplied, rather it is the same as what is multiplied, as well as what is multiplied in the one or multiplied by one in it from one or many does not multiply, rather it is the same as what is multiplied, so this is the matter. Undoubtedly one and the multiplication of the thing in the thing is his ascribe it to him and we are many from one transcendent and transcendent eye that belongs to it in creation and we belong to it in existence. In many and in the world the impact of his names and the impact, as we presented the image of the name in the lists, so the oneness of the truth struck only in the forms of his names, so I remained about him, and after the beating he did not come out except him and the names are many. The colors of the ranks and the coloring are relative to them. If you say one is true, and if you say many are true, then the names of God are many, with different meanings, and God is the Guide.

In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

Chapter Two Hundred and Thirteen in Case of Jealousy

poetry in meaning

Change is when it is dangerous *** between knowledge and judgment people go

If he says what is by virtue of his refutation, he knows *** from the truth in response to him being bankrupt

Such is the one with the quantity who is more ignorant than *** He did not guide him in the darkness of the night with a light

And the burden of truth is more appropriate for you to remove it *** from it, for that judgment is not inconsistent

[ Jealousy is the witnessing of others, if it is proven that he then changed, and it has three stations .]

Know that when the sect s jealousy is on three levels, jealousy for the truth, jealousy for the truth, and jealousy for the truth, it has three states according to what is attributed to it for the sake of homogeneity. The specificity of the existence of the other is not the eye of its reasonableness, for it is undoubtedly reasonable, but whether this unreasonable eye exists or not. It must be, and the plurality is undoubtedly reasonable, but does it have an in-kind existence or not in it? Who said that this apparent abundance in the eye is different conditions existing in one eye that do not exist except in that eye, so it is lineage, there is no reality that has an eye in the physical existence, and whoever said that it has eyes did not say