And it is like the solution to it, so it appears to him that he walked in the total, so if it becomes clear to him that in the total the behavior appears that he has that the outward does not exist in the eye and that the outward is restricted by the rule of the preparedness of the outward appearance and he saw the truth saying and what you threw when you threw but God threw and likewise if he said and what he threw is correct as it is correct in the end The first is that whoever discovers this knowledge from himself knows that he asked you to ask you

[ Indeed, those who follow are on ranks ]

Then know that the walkers whom we mentioned are in ranks, so some of them are those who ask from him to him, and among them are those who ask from him to him, and among them are those who ask from him to him in him with him, and of them are those who ask from him, neither in him nor in him, and among them are those who ask to him neither from him nor in him, and among them are those who are asked neither from him, nor to him, nor in him, and he is described as behavior and that he is followed. And among them is the one who travels without traveling, and among them is the one who travels, and he is in the door that follows this door, so every traveler is a traveler, and not every traveler is a traveler, as we will mention it, God willing, after this chapter in the traveler s door. And as for the one who is asked to Him in Him, then He is the one who is asked from a divine name to a divine name in a divine name. And as for the one who seeks it, neither from it nor in it, then he is the fleeing to him in the universe from the universe, like the flight of Moses, peace be upon him. Than he wired his Lord Or by himself until the end of the division in it, and the behavior has ranks and secrets for long consideration and takes us away from what is intended in this book of economy and restricting it to the necessary knowledge that the people of God s way need to explain to them those who opened it to them like us. In it is one of our thoughts on the road, so how about the road, and we did not disturb any of the principles that depend on it on the road, so we have summarized it briefly between a gesture and a clarification

( Chapter One Hundred and Ninety Knowing the Traveler

And he is the one whose behavior resulted in things intended and unintended for him, and he is a traveler in thought, action and belief .

Where or from where are you traveling *** and that for the life of God is alienating

The case is reasonable, the evidence and its law *** So don't be one of those who travels for God's sake

And do not deprive him of every universe, for he is the eye, except that the servant is perplexed

It is in it, so travel not to it, and do not be ignorant, for how many intellects persevere upon it

[ The traveler in the way of God is two men ]

Know, may God help you, that the traveler in God s way is two men, traveling with his thoughts in reasonable matters and considerations, and a traveler with actions, and they are the owners of currencies. A person who manages the roads and streets of his city and is not a traveler, so let him fast and complete his prayers. Let us mention the condition of the traveler on the road. God is the supporter and the conciliator. God willing. Existence, so he accepts it, or non-existence, so he accepts it. If the two things are equal in his right, the attribution of existence to him in his essence is not more important than the proportion of non-existence, so he lacked the likely existence that one of the two descriptions preferred to him over the other. He knew what was necessary for this craftsman who created him, and it resulted in evidence for his singularity with the attributes of purification, the transcendence of what he is, this possible of lack, and that this likely existence is necessary for himself. Existence for himself is impossible for him to non-existence because his feet are proven, and that whoever proves his feet is impossible to non-existence, because if his non-existence was for himself, he would not be necessary for existence for himself, and if he does not exist, then it must be that the non-existent has an impossible existence or non-existence.