It has and we do not have in the divine knowledge an issue more ambiguous than this issue, for the possibilities according to the doctrine of the group did not benefit from the truth except existence, and no one knows what the meaning of their saying they benefited only existence except those who revealed God from his insight and the owners of this launch do not know its meaning as the matter is in it in Himself, for there is then only God Almighty and the potentialities in the state of non-existence. This benefited existence is either existing and what is God and not the objects of the possible, or it is an expression of the existence of the truth. Described by Himself and that is the Truth, because the evidence has been established that there is no then existence except for the existence of the Truth, then He is necessary to exist for Himself, so it is proven that He then exists for Himself other than God. Except by truth, which is pure existence, so what is given by the realities of objects came to it, then the limits occurred, the quantities appeared, the judgment and the judiciary were implemented, the high, the low, the middle, the different, the opposite, and the types of beings, their types, types, persons, conditions, conditions and judgments appeared in one and the same. Then the forms were distinguished in it and the names of truth appeared, and it had an effect on what appeared in existence. Other than that, to attribute these effects to the objects of the possible ones in the apparent ones. Editing this issue is very difficult, for the phrase falls short of it, and the visualization does not control it because of the speed of its evasion and the contradiction of its rulings. The meaning of abandoning slavery in relation to the scholars of God

[ The servitude of inflection and the servitude of possibility ]

And as for those of them who descended from this class, he says that it is not correct to leave it inwardly because of the lack of which the innovator does not deny from himself, so he must humiliate him. In terms of what is possible, and I called it worship from that section, so in knowledge it is possible to leave it out of disposition, not out of possibility. That is because the reality of slavery is to stand at the commands of the Master, and here is an enjoiner except for the one from whom it is valid to act as he commanded, and actions are God s creation, so he is the one who commands and commands, so where is the disposition? The real by which the slave is called a slave who adheres to the commands of his master or who disputes with him, so he is characterized by repentance, so the named slave remains on the appearance of divine power by the flow of the action on its outward and inward, either with the approval of the command or in opposition to it. All the scholars of taste among the people of God except a group of our companions and others who are not among us who see the opposite and that what is possible has an action and that God has delegated to His servants to do some of the possible actions, so He commanded them to do it. A: The Umrah is for God, and they strive for God and the like. If they prove that the slave has a right, it is not valid to abandon the servitude of the syllable. As for the servitude of possibility, they are unanimously agreed on its being and that it is not conceivable to leave it. This is subjective to the possible. He left a state, not a reality, the hundredth part ended

( Chapter one hundred and thirty-two on knowing the place of righteousness )

The straight has a specific mandate *** that includes the entire universe in its allocation

For the upright, his souls descend *** with the perfume hidden in their quotation

Integrity descends upon its masters *** of which it has not attained houses

It is his description, Glory be to Him, in the story *** He said it, so see it in its text

[ Needing what is not necessary without intending to do so ]

These verses came to necessitate what is not necessary without intention, and likewise like them, I only utter what God is doing in us without action or deliberation.