To ascribe anything but to God and servitude is an attribute of the servant, so whoever witnesses his servitude is for the one who witnesses. That is why he attributes the servants of God to servitude, not to servitude, for they are servants of God without attribution, unlike their attribution to servitude, for the truth does not accept the attribution of servitude because it is the attribute of the servant, not the eye of the servant. It is seen that he is a servant of God, so he differentiates between what is ascribed to an attribute and what is added to God. The people of the tongue said a man between privacy and exclusivity and between servitude and servitude and servitude in relation to it and servitude in relation to the master. However, there is a difference between them, for he said affirmation of creation and did not say the existence of creation because the essence of the existence of creation is the same as the existence of the truth and creation in terms of its essence is fixed and its affirmation of itself is eternal, and its attribute of existence is an accident that has occurred to him. God and creation, so the truth is not the essence of fixed objects, unlike when they are characterized by existence. He is the Exalted, the One who is described in existence, not it. That is why this one who said about the difference said that it is the affirmation of creation. In the essence of the existence of the Truth, the rulings of fixed objects in it do not appear except by virtue of its ruling. That is why the limits appeared and the ranks of objects were distinguished in the existence of the Truth, so it was said that properties, spheres, elements, generators, genera, species, persons, and the essence of existence are one and the rulings are different due to the difference of fixed objects that are undoubtedly alternates in constancy, not in existence, so understand. Whoever said separation witnesses their diversity in their conditions and wants their rulings to appear in the existence of the truth, for it is diverse, and the truth does not accept diversity.

I collected and separated with it *** so communication was doubled in number

He wanted the one to appear in the ranks of numbers, so the two, the three, and the four things appeared until the appearance of the one did not end. One in the other, so we did not see anything but one, and he is the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace. He is in terms of personality, so the turning of the one by himself on the rank of the two is the eye of the appearance of the two and then nothing but the eye of the one and so on what remains of the endless numbers, so realize the meaning of the distinction if you have a sound core and God says the truth and He guides the way.

Chapter Twenty-Four Two Hundred in Knowing the Eye of Control

The eye of control for the people is to act to show privacy in the language of extroversion in supplication.

No matter how much Arif controls his creation *** without an order, frivolity exists

Leaving control is the epitome of every investigator *** Must be modest, even if it comes to him willingly

What are the deaf men who are notables? *** The chosen ones have ruling souls

Rather, they are slaves who are still humble *** in any case, the testimony is permanent

The control of the veil is his place *** behind the curtains of the dark messengers

If it is about a divine command by definition, then the person in him is a servant who complies with the command of his master in the way that it is obligatory. Ignorance of what is in God s knowledge of whether it is what gives the trust to its people or not. The control point is specific to the messengers in manifesting miracles and challenging them from the divine command, for they are sent with indications that they are God s messengers.