... As a gift that has reached the Kaaba, or penance for food for the needy, or equivalent to that is fasting so that he may taste it, and his order is to be punished as the dead is tormented in his grave. God forbids it, and whoever transgresses it, and the one who transgresses the punishment for him is forgiven. He will afflict him with it either in this world or in the Hereafter, for he has not been appointed

[ The sciences of the secrets kept from the Gentiles ]

And know that every knowledge of the secrets that are preserved in the treasures of jealousy that are only given to its people, is because it

He, peace and blessings of God be upon him, said: Do not give wisdom to anyone other than its rightful one, so you will oppress it

It is like hunting in the heat of the Haram or Ihram or both, I mean in the two protectors. If he kills her, and he is to give her to someone who is not her family, he does not know her value, so she dies with him, and her woe is upon him, so he disbelieves in her and is a heretic. He knows its value, and it shows him its status until his heart is revived by it, and he is deliberately killed by that person, the exact ignorance that he had, which was the reason for his loss of this knowledge and the image of the punishment and the scourge in him. I seek refuge in God from being one of the ignorant, so He forbids what is perfection in the same matter, since ignorance is among the secrets stored in the ignorant people, so keeping them makes the world suffer from them. For they did not understand the words of God, so do not be of the ignorant, for it does not end except with a well-known fact that he has, for if he does not know ignorance, he does not know what he is forbidden to do. Blame the tastes

[ Knowing of God is the same thing as ignorance of Him ]

Do you not see the sect have unanimously agreed that knowledge of God is the same thing as ignorance of Him, the Most High, and God Almighty said of the ignorant, that is what they attain of knowledge, so he called ignorance a knowledge for the one who perceives. He is the eye of ignorance, and he who has the eye of knowledge is the eye of signification and evidence, and he is the signifier, so he is the eye of knowledge of God.

And the knowledge of God is the negation of the knowledge of God *** and the proof is from the description of the one who is described as al-Sahi

So knowledge is ignorance because the eye is one *** and ignorance is knowledge that God is in the invisible

The sixty-ninth part is over

( In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful )

( Connect in the chapter on their differences regarding the verse of killing game in the Sanctuary and Ihram in its penance, is it in order or not )

The verse is his saying, then a recompense is like that of the animals that were killed to the end of the verse. They differed about this verse as to whether it is in order, and some of them said that it is the like first. If not, then feeding. If not, then fasting or the verse on the choice. Or it requires the choice, and if he wanted to arrange, he would have said and explained as he did in the penances of arrangement, so whoever did not find it, our doctrine on this issue is that the proverb mentioned here is not as some of them saw it to make in an ostrich a camel, and in a gazelle a sheep, and in a wild cow a human cow, but in everything like it. An ostrich bought an ostrich that caught it permissible in a permissible manner, as well as every name of the game that is permitted to catch and eat birds and four-legged animals, or expiation by feeding the same thing to me. If he looks at the value of what is equal to that proverb, then he buys food for its value and feeds it to the needy, or adjusts that to fasting, so we look at the closest expiation similar to this comprehensive penance For sacrifice, feeding or fasting, so we did not find anyone but one who shaved his head while he was in ihraam because of the harm that befallen him. So a ransom from fasting, alms, or sacrifice. So he mentioned the three mentioned in the penance for the killer of hunting, so the lawgiver there made feeding six poor persons for each poor person half a saa , and he made fasting three days of grief. There is a day for every Sa , so we look at the value. If it reaches a Sa a or less in a day, then the fast does not rescind, and if the value reaches it, we buy with it two Sa s or less than two Sa s, or more than the Sa in two days, and so on. By buying according to what we have read, then he has the choice between like, feeding for the value of like, and fasting