Before he reaches the house, this meeting takes place in other than the two houses, it is called a quarrel, and here the owner of this situation has one of three things: either the benefit is obtained at the required meeting for that name from this slave and for this servant from that name, so the name is separated from him to his name and the servant returns to the place from which he came out, or The divine name judges him by referring to what came out of it, and that divine name is with him until he connects him to what came out of it, or the divine name takes it with him and ascends with it to his name. Because he gives rulings contrary to what he gives him if his descent is not known to the people of taste and the people of drinking and watering, and we have made in this book of the arguments that you stand on, God willing.

[ home and domicile ]

And know that houses are not given this name except when landing in them. The one who disposes of the houses of the house in which he resides, as long as the gnostic is accompanied by one divine name despite his different behavior in it, it is his abode in terms of the total, and it is impossible for one of two souls to be established on one condition, then he must move in every soul and for this reason some of the people of God prevented it from being The name is a domicile or abode, because he imagined that every soul and every state has a divine name, and he did not know that the divine name might have a ruling or have many different rulings, so it would be a domicile for this person as long as he acts under its rulings. An adjective for a ruling is correct, but if they want the impossibility of two souls remaining on one ruling by way of adding the ruling to the one, it is not correct, for the objects of this divine name, the Forgiving, conceals it from such and such and such, and so on, according to the demands that it requires in every soul, which it is correct for the Name of the Forgiving to conceal from it successively and consecutively. who changed It is not necessary that it be interspersed with something that asks for another name, and for this reason it is correct to exaggerate it because it multiplies it, and so is the Creator, the Provider, and all the names that have a rule in the universe. And the shortness of time is what brings benefit to the owner of taste, and we deposit every door of what we have in it but a drop of an ocean ocean. This is in view of what we have in it. It was seven in number, in terms of mothers, but it is more than that, and we must devote us to her from our limitation of it, so that he knows how far it will end in the path of truth, for it contains many benefits that are proven in our books, and God, Glory be to Him, says the truth and He guides the way. Bringing out the unseen by the divine names, the science of creation, the science of the unseen that is included in the testimony, the science of likeness, and the science of breathing the soul into awe.

Chapter Two hundred and seventy-second on knowing the house of exaltation of monotheism

With the integrity of God's monotheism I say *** and that is the light of what he has I say

And his integrity is between a self and a rank *** and the one who knows about it is few

Take a break from the purity of every purity *** So whoever wants a word, let him say what he says

For the existence of the truth in the letter of its absence *** then the letter of the presence of what must be accepted

[ The meaning of the word purity of monotheism is twofold ]

Know that God has supported us and you with a spirit from Him that what is meant by the word purity of monotheism is two things, one is that monotheism is related to exaltation, not the truth, Glory be to Him, and the other matter is that permissiveness is added to monotheism, meaning that the truth, the Most High, may be exalted by the exaltation of monotheism, not by the exclusivity of the creatures with monotheism, like Hamad al-Hamd. Assuming the adjective with the descriptor does not involve a claim and does not address the possibility of the descriptor himself or someone else in a capacity that lacks evidence for the truthfulness of his claim. This relates to chapters indicated by verses from the book, including whether it is correct to include before the dhikr without the necessity of poetry or not. The poet says

May God reward Uday bin Hatim on my behalf

So he pronounced before the remembrance, but poetry is a place of necessity and one of the chapters of this house