From this and with this sincerity, abandoning it is more preferable, because observing God s right is more important than observing creation, since taking care of creation is not about observing the truth, otherwise it is flattery and flattery is a reprehensible adjective. Or does that act have a divine description in the epithets, so you rely on it in it, even if it is reprehensible in creation, then it is praiseworthy in the aspect of truth because the truth in it appears for a matter dictated by the ruling, so its divine basis is the saying of Noah to his people, so we make fun of you as you ridicule, and God says that we name you... The same is forgotten, and a ruling similar to this is intended. If the infidels are attached to it, will the infidels be rewarded for what they were doing. So the place of martyrdom from this approval is in the picture, so the name is withdrawn from him in the divine grace as it was withdrawn from him in the cosmic aspect. The people of God saw the emergence of the divine approval. In one assembly, we said, You have spoken the truth in what I have mentioned in the very essence of what we have cited, for we did not intend anything but approval. In this world, with what was expanded for them in it, which included their destruction, here the plot occurred to them where the plot occurred from them, rather in some or most of the facts, rather all of them.

When Omar Ibn Al-Khattab entered the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, he found him and Abu Bakr weeping over the case of the prisoners of Badr.

That is, I agree with you in sending tears and weeping, such as being present, showing an image without reality, for it is an image without a soul, except that it has a significant origin that can be traced back to it, which is what we mentioned. In his saying, And disbelief is not satisfied for His servants, and if you are thankful, He is pleased with you. And it is a nice part, so let him look there. Rather, we brought it here as an image. We did not go by the doctrine of investigation that we have in things, but we brought it out, the director of the dialectical proof that is intended to deflect the argument of the opponent, not to establish the proof of the truth. We have shown that imagination is an existential presence and that imaginary things are described by existence, so the existent appears in the form of the rule of existence except for this imagined existence in itself. The council said that this is from the imaginary consciousness, not from the existing consciousness of the soul outside the presence of the imagination. He has in the imagination a valid ruling in the sense, such as the owner of the yellow if he is in a place where he imagines falling from it and then falls. He annihilates him from sensation as the owner of true consciousness perishes, but between them there are two differences in the result, which we have mentioned in the explanation of what is unreliable on the way. His imagination is in the presence and it is known, and the true awareness is a coincidence in that the owner does not feel it, so he does not know what will bring him to him, and we have mentioned in existence what is in it rich, and God says the truth and He guides the way.

Chapter Two hundred and thirty-six on the conscience

If you are separated from you by the arrival of a matter *** then that feeling is not hidden

He has a ruling and he is not subject to a ruling *** Yes, and he has pleasure and annihilation

And this is one of the most wonderful things about him *** for his temperament is honey and water