It was said that he did not perform circumambulation and kneel, and it is disliked after the circumambulation and before the bowing.

The acts of Umrah except for the barber, for they agreed that it is not by comparison, and that is all according to some of them. If he brought the guidance, and with it I say, if he did not give him a gift, then they differed about his Hajj, as well as the singular Hajj. His pilgrimage that he intended is completed, whether he brought the guidance or not. The Qarir that is required to perform the Tamattu is according to the audience who are not present at the Sacred Mosque, except for Ibn al-Majshon. In it, if he did not have a sacrifice, and we mentioned it earlier in this chapter. As for those who permitted Hajj for those who did not offer the guidance, and in the origin of the new moon for Hajj, and if the guidance is given which is better, then the one who says the individual is better, and who says the Qur an, and who says the tamattu , know that what is forbidden is not forbidden just as the existing does not exist. Ihram the saddlebag before it swarms, then laps to the ihram for the previous Umrah, and suffices it without disagreement.

[ The comparative ability of the verb and its effect on the potential ]

You have been presented with the ruling on the overlapping of divine names in the ruling, and you have been presented with the singularity of the ruling on the divine name, which does not include the ruling of others in its ruling, so you should look at it there. Some of the overseers and morals in others, and all agreed that the creation of the comparative ability for the appearance of the act is from the servant of God and that it is not from the earning of the servant or from his creation, and they differed whether it has an effect on the predetermined or not. The servant, if he was not able to act, he would not have charged God, and God does not burden a soul beyond its scope, which is what he is able to do. What he was asked to bring from the assignment, and some of them said that the omnipresent ability has no effect of creation in the existing potential of the servant, and the servant has nothing in the action that comes from him except gain, which is his choice for that action since he was neither forced nor forced into it.

[ Subjective requirements are not actions but judgments ]

As for the people of God who are His family, then the visible actions of the objects of creation are only affinities of the apparent in the objects of these possibilities, and that the preparation of the possible affected the external in the externals in the objects of the possibilities. The establishment of knowledge for the one to whom the rule of the world is carried out, and the fact that the scientist is a scholar is not an act at all. The causal subjective requirements are not actions attributed to the one who appeared from him, but rather they are rulings for him. So the actions of those charged with it are the actions or abandonment that they were assigned with, knowing that the apparent present is the truth and nothing else is in the same position as what we mentioned in the dialogue The divine names and their convergence in the fields of debate and their orientations on the place described in a certain capacity with different rulings and subjugating each other as the doer of the act called sin and disobedience to whom the name is directed to pardon, forgiveness, avenger and punisher. He does not accept it because of the contrast between these rulings, as the subjugation of some names in ruling over others has appeared, and the Divine Presence is one

[ Attribution of actions to God with the oneness of the subject and the difference of judgment ]

If you know this, it is easy for you to attribute all actions to God as you attribute all the beautiful names to God Almighty or the Most Merciful, with the sameness of the eye and the difference in judgment.

( In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful )

( Arrived in the washing class for Ihram )

Some say that it is obligatory, and some say that ablution is sufficient for him, and some say that it is a confirmed Sunnah, more certain than the Friday ablution

[ Internal purity is obligatory in every act of worship ]

Know that the inward purity in every act of worship is obligatory for the people of God, except for those who believe that the one who is obligated is only the apparent in the manifestation of what is notable of the possible things.