[ The ruling on residency according to Sharia scholars ]

Iqamah has a ruling and a recipe. As for its ruling, people differed about it. Some said that it is a confirmed Sunnah in the right of notables and groups more than the call to prayer, and some said that it is an obligation and it is the doctrine of some of the people of the outward. I saw for some of them that the prayer is invalidated by abandoning it, and there is someone who says that whoever abandons it deliberately, his prayer is invalidated. This is the school of Ibn Kinana.

Consider it in judgment

Residing for the sake of God is an inevitable obligation, and residency is for what God has commanded us to establish for it, then we are in it according to the presumptions of the circumstances. You outweighed the weight in the judiciary, then it is better, for you have complied with the command of God, for he did not outweigh the scale until he was characterized by the residence that is the limit of duty, then he outweighed and the one who loses the scale did not reach the limit by weight until the duty is done, like what the weighted did. There is another praise for him, for the weighted one is praiseworthy in two respects, so know and praise him from the point of view of residence is higher, because praise is obligatory.

His saying, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, about the judge: What is upon him if she weighs, then he weighs

So he commanded him to be preponderant, and he affirmed that in word and deed. To mention the evidence for fear of making it lengthy, we did not go out, praise be to God, from the Book and the Sunnah in it, as Al-Junayd said. Our knowledge is bound by the Book and the Sunnah.

( As for the status of residence )

For a people the takbeer that in its beginning is twofold, and what remains in it is an individual, and the takbeer that is after the residency is two, and for a people like that except the residency, it is two, and people chose between the two and the singular, and some said the double in all and square and the first takbeer with agreement in the unification of the other tahleel

consideration [in the status of residence]

As for the one who doubles down on any one who exceeds the one, then the ranks we mentioned in the call to prayer are the same, and we did not modify it for another consideration, because it came in the apparent of Sharia with the wording of the call to prayer, not with another word except the Iqamah. God for His servants for the one who came to the mosque waiting for prayer, or was on the way to come to it, or was in the state of ablution because of it, or was in the state of intent to perform ablution before commencing it to perform that ablution and dies in some of these places all, he will have a reward for those who prayed it, and if it was what you fell from it came with the wording The past is in order to achieve attainment, and if it does happen, then he has the reward of actually obtaining it and the reward of obtaining that which happens to someone who dies in this place before he enters the prayer.

It has been reported in the news that a person is in prayer as long as he is waiting for the prayer

That is why he came with the past tense, and it is the case in his saying that the prayer and the establishment of the prayer has been completed in its entirety and perfection. So it is written for him as a predator in terms of his action, unlike what is written for him before the act, so see how great God s grace is to His servants. In the most perfect manner, then God Almighty gave his servant that reward for the most perfect performance. Praise be to God for that

( Separate rather pray in the Qibla )

[ The ruling on heading to the Kaaba in prayer ]

The Muslims agreed that turning towards the qiblah, meaning the Kaaba, is a condition of the validity of prayer. So wherever they turn, then God faces judgment in the one who is ignorant of the qiblah, so he prays where he thinks it most likely with his ijtihad, without disagreement. There is no dispute that if a person inspects the House, the obligatory act upon him is to face his eye. But if he does not see the House, then our scholars differed in two places on this issue, the same place: is the obligation the eye or the direction and the second place