Is it obligatory by injury or ijtihad, I mean injury to the eye or the side by the one who enjoins the evil eye, so who says that the obligation is the eye, and who says that the obligation is the side, and in the direction I say no to the eye, for in that there is hardship, and God says, and He has not placed upon you in religion any hardship, and I mean by side if the Kaaba is absent from sight And the long line had their prayers valid with the certainty that all of them did not meet the eye. This is reasonable

[ Consideration in determining the qiblah ]

The consideration of limitation in the qiblah is to remove the servant from his choice, for his origin and the origin of everything except God is compulsion and compulsion, even the choice of the servant is forced in his choice. The saying I have is not altered, and I am not unjust to the slaves. He said, God has the ultimate argument, and I have not seen anyone who understands this divine saying, because its meaning is very clear and because God is so clear that it is not hidden in the matter and that what God has pointed out. And He performs it upon His servants, and among them and among them, and for this reason He said, He is not asked about what He does, and they are questioned.

[ Determining things and the actions of the chosen subject ]

Then we return to the consideration of what we were about, and we say that prayer is an entry into the truth and it came in the correct report that prayer is a light and a person has sight in his interior as he is in his appearance, so he must reveal in his prayer. In this place and in all acts of worship, he has a limitation on things so that he is in his actions by virtue of necessity, and he is an origin that includes everything that is present and does not exclude a present one who is present for one who has an iron sight and gives hearing while he is a witness even in the ruling of what is permissible. He is not chosen because it is impossible for him to be judged Other than the permissibility of an obligation, a mandate, a prohibition, or a dislike

[ Facing the eye of the Kaaba and facing its direction ]

For this reason, it is prescribed for him to face the House if he sees it when he is praying, and to face his direction if he is absent from him, and his imposition in his ijtihad by backbiting is an injury to ijtihad, not an injury to the eye. It is impossible for a creature to know it, so it is impossible for the eye of himself to meet his heart, i.e. it is impossible for the wise person to know his Lord in terms of his eye, but he knows him in terms of the possible in his lack of him and his distinction from him that he is not characterized by the characteristics of the newly created in the way that characterizes the possible innovator because he is nothing like him He does not know him except by means, and this is the reason why we say by direction, not by eye

[ The obligation on the one who is obligated is ijtihad, not injury in ijtihad ]

And the injury is an injury to ijtihad, not an injury to the eye, and for this reason the mujtahid was rewarded in any case, especially.

The saying of the Messenger of God, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, about the Mujtahid: He is right and wrong

So what we mean in this matter and its like is that the one who strives in the injury is what is the injury of the eye or the injury of the side, that the rightful one who said the injury of the side, and the wrong one who said the injury of the eye, because the injury of the side is in the clouds accumulated night or day in the prairie does not happen except by virtue of agreement, so rather the injury to the eye not by virtue Knowledge and what we worship God by meteorology or by predictive engineering on meteorology deduced from it the lengths and widths of the country, then in every way, if we take our souls with it without certainty, then it becomes clear that the obligation is on the one who is obligated to strive, not injury, so there is no repetition of the one who prayed and did not correct the direction if it became clear to him after he prayed as well.

Inward consideration

If the beholder fulfills his due consideration, he becomes unable to comprehend, then he believes in him, and then there is nothing but impotence. The truth is when every belief believes after his ijtihad. The Almighty says, And whoever invokes with God another deity for which he has no proof, then understand as he is when his servant thinks of him, except that the ranks differ, and God is broader, greater, and greater than being limited. In an attribute that controls it, it is with one of His servants, and it is not with the other, and he refuses the divine expansion. That is because God says while He is with you, wherever you are and wherever you turn, then the Face of God and the Face of everything is with one or the other. With him was the one who neither he nor with him worships, and his concern is not his Lord, and God says: And your Lord has decreed that you worship none but Him, i.e., a judgment and for His sake the gods were worshipped. In a special way, it was not prescribed for him from the side of truth, so he is wretched. Therefore, they said about the partners: We do not worship them except to bring us closer to God, so they acknowledged Him. It is proven that whoever faces the eye of the house if he sees it, or the direction if he is absent from him with his face and faces his Lord in his kiss as it is prescribed for him in his heart and sense in