Some of them see the purity of the Sharia as seeing it from the One True God. Therefore, we should not challenge the judgment of a mujtahid, because the Sharia, which is God s judgment, has decided that judgment, so it is God s law by defining it, and it is an issue that is prohibited by all the sects because they did not bring up what we have pointed out despite their knowledge of it. But they neglected to evoke it, so they abused manners with God in that, when the literate among God s servants won that.

[ Missing the saying attributing all actions to God in all respects ]

If the law is violated, and it appears on the issue of what is the ruling of monotheism, which removes the ruling of the law at all, the ruling will move to purity. Because of the appearance of this effect, it is a violation of the Sharia and a lifting of the rule of God, just as it is not permissible to wipe with the demise of the name of the slippers. That we say, God created you and what you do. The deeds are created by God, even though they are attributed to us.

[ The emergence of monotheism in three houses ]

The people of our path differed greatly on this issue in the form of what the people of wiping over the slippers differed about equally. As for limiting it with three fingers, then consider the appearance of monotheism in three places. to the man s wiping or washing, just as a person s disassociation himself from such monotheism is transmitted, as he removed the ruling of Sharia from him, so the ruling of the one who removed the name of the slipper from him

( Chapter on the timing of the survey )

[ The jurists differ in the timing of the survey ]

There is a difference of opinion on that. Who says that the timing has three days and nights for the traveler, and one day and night for the resident, and who says that there is no timing and he should wipe what appears to him as long as there is no impediment such as janaabah

( His judgment arrived in the interior )

[ The meaning of wiping a traveler for three days and nights ]

As for the ruling on that in the interior on the doctrine of timing, we have decided in wiping over the slippers in the door of the world and the learner that this is a journey where the matter passed from the teacher to the learner, and the Messenger of God, peace be upon him, when he taught people their laws, repeated the word three times until he was understood because he He is commanded to explain and inform. This is the meaning of wiping the traveler three times

[ present day and night time ]

As for the timing of the present day and night, he has nothing in himself but to do that matter, so he teaches it, so he does not repeat it for himself, because it has appeared to him and he is of himself with certainty, and he is not certain that others will accept that when teaching, so he repeats it three times to make sure that he has understood it.

[ The meaning of untimedness in the survey ]

Whoever did not say specifically looked at the innate nature of the educated, some of them understand the first time, and some of them do not understand until after detailing and repetition time after time until he understands, so he does not time a specific number in the event that he teaches someone else who is in the status of travel and does not look at it in himself who is in the status of urban, for in himself he has He could imagine what appeared to him that it might be a suspicion, so he would investigate it repeatedly, so there is no timing

[ The impurity is alienation and the impurity is the stranger ]

As for the rule of janaabah in removing the slippers, janaabah is alienation and the junub is strange, and if something strange occurs in the heart that undermines the law, it is considered in the mind without inference from the law, such as if he thinks of the danger of the Brahman who denies the law, then he does not accept the evidence of the law to invalidate this saying that occurred to him, it is the subject of dispute He must tend to infer from the law to infer from what the evidence gives him, whether that happens to him, such as being present, or to someone else, such as travelling. Just as the one who is junub, whether he is traveling or present, must remove the slippers.

( Chapter on the condition of wiping over the socks )

[ The difference of jurists regarding the condition of wiping over the socks ]

It is said that one of the conditions for wiping is that the two men be pure with the purity of ablution, and someone says that there is no condition except that they be purified from impurity.

( He reached the ruling on the subconscious in that )

[ Being clear of the truth from jogging, and denying what he described himself with. ]

As for the internal ruling in that, the reasonable purity in the interior is to be exalted, as we have established rationally and legally, and this special purity for the two men is a legal purification. And if the mind does not accept, in terms of its evidence, this attribution to Him, the Most High, and faith accepts it, and negates the analogy with His saying, there is nothing like Him.