With theoretical evidence

[ Divine jogging in the eyes of faith and in the eyes of reason ]

And the divine rush is not interpreted by weakening and affirming the divine turnout for the servant, nor by any other kind of clear interpretation. Rather, it was interpreted by the wise people who have interpreted it by multiplying the divine turnout with great reward for the servant if he comes to his Lord seeking worship that includes walking such as striving to mosques and quests in circumambulation and to circumambulation and to Hajj And to the clinic of the sick, to fulfilling people s needs, to funerals, and to every worship in it that strives near its place or after. The Almighty said: O you who have believed, when the call to prayer on Friday is called, then hurry to that.

[ Being honest with the truth is that he does not remove from him what he described himself with. ]

So ablution is describing the truth as running around, and purity, which is cleanliness, is the purification of the truth, that it does not remove from it what it describes itself with. With regard to the attributes of the truth with what he utters, he does not have to reject that if he is a believer, and the one who is uttered and described in that capacity is acceptable, i.e. acceptable or unknown. The mind is required to accept the legitimate description, and if it is ignorant to accept the one described for it, we went in the purification of the two men to linguistic purity, which is cleanliness and purification from impurity, so we do not have to There is something that is branched from this issue from issues on the doctrine of those who say that ablution is pure. But if he wears slippers on slippers, then he describes the truth itself as jogging, for jogging is an attribute of striving, and striving is an attribute of a man. The foot is another matter, and that is the pursuit, as it is like a slipper on a slipper, and we have already discussed it, so understand

( Chapter on knowing the invalidator of the purity of wiping over the slippers )

[ What is agreed upon and what is different about it ]

Agreeing that its nullifiers nullifies all ablution, and its chapter will come in this section later. The scholars differed as to whether it nullifies the purity or not. So, it is said that purity nullifies and resumes ablution. Removing the slippers does not affect the purification of the foot, and with it I say, and if he resumes ablution, then it is more cautious and does not affect his entire purity, unless something happens that invalidates it, as will be mentioned below.

( He reached the ruling on the subconscious in that )

[ The application of the disclaimer in the general description ]

As for the rule of the batin regarding one who says that all purity is invalidated, then it is the validity of purification in the described.

[ Shar a negates a specific description of the truth ]

And whoever says that a man s purity is invalidated in particular is that the law removes from the truth a specific description, then it is not necessary for him to remove every description that requires an analogy, for God, Glory be to Him, has purified Himself to give birth, and what He has disgraced Himself from hesitating about a matter that He wants to do. anger

[ The denial of physical birth from God, not selection, which is a spiritual birth ]

Whoever says that he is on his purity, and if he takes off the slippers, there is no ruling for him and no effect on the purity with which he was described in the event that he puts on his shoes, he says, and if the truth itself is free from giving birth, then the description for him remains. On his ruling by saying, the Most High, If He willed. This is like the saying of the Most High, Had there not been a book from God that would have preceded, and His saying, What would alter the saying I have? that

( water doors )

[ The provisions of water, outwardly and inwardly ]

The discussion has been presented at the beginning of the chapter on the difference between rainwater and spring water, and we have clarified that what is rich in it.

( door into the water )

[ What the fuqaha unanimously agreed upon in the matter of water and what they differed on ]

The scholars unanimously agreed that all waters are pure in themselves and purified by others, except sea water, for there is a difference of opinion in it. It is called water at all, for it is pure and purified, whether it is sea water or raw water. The impurity that fell into it was not affected, except that I know in this issue a dispute regarding a little water in which a little impurity falls, so that nothing of its characteristics changes.

( The ruling of the sub has arrived on this )

[ Water is the life in which hearts live .]

As for the rule of the inner