Nor the hereafter. If his scene is his worship in the event of his ascension and the truth descended to him as the truth described itself as descending, and the meeting took place, which is the fight, since the servant has a work of deeds because he must be in a righteous legitimate work and he who ascends with it, then it shines because it is carried and receives it from God from Where that is the work of righteousness that God appointed for the one who brought it and it is predestined and known, then the truth looks at this person who is obligated and sees it, even though he is in his work not witnessed by him that work because he knows that God is the one who works with it, not he and that he is a place to create the work with it and as a machine for the existence of that work, so the truth is given The merit of that action in terms of what he promised in it and looking at what the scene of that person finds in his worship that he was still upon in the absence of it, so then there is a recompense in meeting her except that he does not grant her neglect of her at the time of creating negligence in the accountable What then but this and it is what we said is possible In the event that it exists, it is necessary for a sovereign rule to appear from him, because in the time of the rule of omissions, the care of this servant in this dispute removes the negligence from worship in any case. From wages, they are specific to A worker and an increase is what we have mentioned regarding the owner of worship, for he does not grant him negligence at the time of work about who is the worker, so he sees that the worker is God, and the wage requested by the work is not returned to the worker except for the worker. The midwife for wages is the wages of someone who, if God accepts the wages, how will his wages be, is it only according to his destiny, and if he is restricted by work, then where is the wage of this person charged with this witness from the wages of those who see in his work that the taxpayer is the worker, not the right, so his wage is according to the amount of this taxpayer, so he only gets the wage of the work in particular Except according to the amount of the worker s wages because the worker has his own self and no destiny for him, and if he did not appear and behave in obedience to his Lord in his work, he would not have a measure of himself and that is why you see the money of the violator to what he would be. If they had a measure by which they deserve happiness, and we do not doubt that in happiness they are differentiated, just as they are different in actions in terms of condition, time, place, specific work, permanence, meeting and solo, etc. By obeying his Lord and estimating his work, then the truth is sold D. This consideration and the determination of the penalty as we have decided. He looks at the witnesses of this taxpayer and sees him as a person of worship and the work follows it in it, and he is not characterized by turning away from the actions or by turning to him and that he is in the state he was in when he is not changed, so he keeps it as it is and obscures the neglect of it, so it has no effect on it. In one way, and this is the general infallibility, so if a violation occurs from him, then it falls by virtue of the decree and predestination from their formation in him as obedience took place. The apparent place is an image of disobedience to the ruling of the discourse of the law, and it is in the same matter, I mean that event is an existence that God created in this place of the existing beings, praise be to Him. Or a good tongue, for in the same matter it is not a sin, but its animal movement is like the movements of the non-commissioned person, not characterized by obedience or disobedience. Or a disobedience that requires them other than this unless they enter into it, and if the possibility enters them in that, it is not permissible for them to weigh the side of the tongue of guilt over other than that, like a man whom you saw in a healthy town in Ramadan eating during the day with your knowledge of him that he is a believer, so the possibility enters in him to be in him no disease

You know him or he is in a state of travel and you do not know that, so you do not have the right to denounce him with this possibility, and you do not have to ask him about that, but your preoccupation with yourself is more important to you.

His saying in this section, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, is that in Paradise there is what no eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no human heart has ever imagined.

[ The face of heaven's name ]

Know that Paradise has not been called Paradise except for what we have mentioned, and the same is true of the angels being called Paradise, and so are the jinn. All of this is due to concealment and concealment. It is not in the same pattern, but rather its ruling is different, and that of this type is the fact that the truth is manifested in the Resurrection and says I am your Lord and they see it and yet they deny it and do not believe in it. Their Lord with the presence of the vision on the lifting of the veil, then