It is no wonder that the universe in every case *** acknowledges slavery and kingship to the king of the king

So the present and the old are linked to each other, linking the addition and the ruling, not linking the existence of the eye. For example, the human being exists in terms of what a human being is, and in the case of his existence, paternity is known, if he does not have a son who gives him his existence, or assessing his existence, the epithet of paternity, and also it is non-existent. He owns it with it. It is said that he is the owner, and so is the king, and if he is present in the eye, it is not said that he has an owner until he has an owner who owns it, then God in terms of himself and his existence is beyond the worlds. That every judgment in the world must be based on a divine attribute, except for the self-qualification that the truth deserves for itself and by which he was rich, and the self-qualification of the one who has merit and by which he was poor, rather a slave, for he is more deserving of the description of poverty, even if poverty and humiliation are alike. As I do not have humiliation and poverty, and the one who is able to do a thing and self-disengagement from a thing, neither that capable person nor the one about whom he reacts is acted upon is not characterized by neediness, unlike the passive, for he is described as humiliation and destitution, so the truth is distinguished from the creation with this. We decided it, and this house has encompassed it, so the narrator says: So, when the judgment is based on desire and it is present in the universe, and the truth is not judged by desire, then desires are not based on them. With what he wants, but with what he has legislated, then when it was said, judge between people according to truth, and do not follow desires. By right, that is, do not do what you want, so let your rule in the nations on the Day of Resurrection be what you have legislated for them and sent us to them, for that is what is intended, for you have not sent us except with what you want until our sincerity is proven with them and the argument against them is established if the truth is judged in every nation by what He sent His Prophet to them, and with this, God will be the proof. adult So the petrification indicated to the creation in their desires that they have freedom of what they are in their souls, then the petrification occurred in judgment and control, as it is effective for what he wants. His restriction is from the law on the authority of his Lord to do so, so desires are nothing but the absolute of wills, so you know why desires are based and the stone is based. From the one eye that accepts them in exchange in the event that each of them is present in that eye and the acceptor does not accept that, so the passion became interdicted on him by the return. Whoever is characterized by it, when God created the speaking soul or the caliph, say what you want, He created in it reasonable, relative, spiritual powers, even if these forces are the eyes of those who are described by them, such as the names and divine attributes whose reference and their abundance are to lineage in one eye that does not accept multiplicity in its essence nor the existential number. For my eyes, it was one of the forces that He created in this Caliph, but in the perfect human and animal, and He is the absolute of man, a power called illusion, a power called intellect, and a power called thought. And the presence of imagination, and he made imagination a medium presence between the two extremes of sense and meaning.

An illustrated power under the rule of the mind and illusion, in which the mind acts by order, and also the illusion also deals with it by order and powers

In this upbringing, the dominion of illusion over the intellect did not make it in the power of the mind to comprehend a matter that is not of the nature of being material or unreasonable from a certain point of view except in a non-material such as the attributes ascribed to God who is beyond being a substance or in a substance, so His ascribed knowledge To him is what is matter and is not ascribed to matter, so he is not in the power of the mind with his knowledge of this, if he enters into it, he can accept it except by imagination.