It is of the status of other attributes ascribed to him and he did not compete with them in the existents, and in it is the knowledge of the revealed assumption, and where is it from the knowledge of the hypothesis deduced from the house, and in it is the knowledge of rational evidence and proofs that judge its creator with what he deserves and his belief in it, Glory be to Him, in what it has judged on him, for God does not set up some verses except for the first The kernels and they are the ones who comprehend its meanings by what the Almighty has instilled in them from the mental power, and He made the soul of the mind to the intellect as a sign, and gave it the power of the memorial memory that reminds him of what had been manifested to him of the truth until he knew it as witnesses and visions. So let him consider it and in it there is the knowledge of the limits that the wise observer must stop at, for the apparent limit, the inner limit, and the one who is aware has a limit, and the limit is for whoever stops at the limit of himself, then it is better if he stops at a limit other than this limit has covered all of what we mentioned and what is the existence on it and if no limits, the information would not be distinguished nor was it information That is why God cursed on the tongue of His Messenger without the illuminations of the earth, meaning the limits, and when the two examples were combined for themselves and did not stop at the identification of their Creator, the Divine Names, the Most Beautiful, turned to them with a hundred degrees of inferiority veiled by a hundred infernal layers on the mirrors of, uh. So they were pleased with this meeting, which made it necessary for them to turn to the whole hereafter world, and in it there is a sociology of the two in psychological judgment, otherwise they are not equal, and in it there is a knowledge of what a thing associates with someone who is not like him, so he is like him from that aspect in which he shared it in particular and separated from him with other matters in which he has likes, so what Then it is known what has the like of a single sentence, so then there is nothing but proverbs and the like. That is why God struck parables and forbade us to set parables for him and his reasons. He said, God knows, and you do not know. He who teaches him the truth will strike parables with knowledge. And the saints, and it is a station behind the phase of the mind, wanting that the mind is not independent of its perception in terms of what it is thinking, for what the mind has from the knowledge of God in terms of its thought is the science of integrity and the quotation of proverbs is a simile and the locus of the simile from the imitation of the parable is precise and known only to the one who knows the suspicious and the likened and the likeness is unknown. The matter is

The one to verify the example has unknown, so looking at it from the point of view of thought is forbidden for every believer, and in the same matter it is forbidden to be reached by everyone with a sound mind and it has the knowledge of squareness in terms of witnesses and in it there is knowledge of the reason for which he asked the plaintiff to prove what he claimed, and that is because he wants to control With what he claimed and control is a divine attribute, and the claimant has the meaning of the unseen and the testimony, the testimony is fixed in its own right, and if he did not claim it, it would be richer in it for the viewer than the case, and the unseen needs with him to establish evidence for what he claimed, and here is a great matter. In it, this claimant has departed with his claim from the scale of what the claim demands in its reality. As for the confessor s control over what he claimed, even if he was lying to himself in his claim, then he may judge you if you establish the limit that is contained in what he confesses. In his confession, in order to ward off his claim of a pain that is greater in his view than the pain that would happen to him from confession if its limits were established on him, and that is because of his ignorance of what his affair with God will lead to in that and his ignorance of the right to himself. And if you are great, then the right of God is more right, followed by the right of yourself. And what is outside of these two rights, then these are the sermons, and in it there is the knowledge of whom God has taken as a guide in which place he will take, and what his claim that necessitated that, and in it is the knowledge of divine morals and the knowledge of the places in which it should be used. By God and in it there is the knowledge of brotherhood between divine grace and mercy, and is there fraternity between pain and mercy or not in order to repel great pain with pain less than it, and in it there is knowledge of the matter that nature hates and praises the truth and what overcomes it and who reaps the fruit of that ball and the bitterness of that atrocity in taste and in it.

The science of conjugating divine wisdom in the human species, especially without other creatures, and it contains knowledge of what a sane person should be upon if he sees in existence what reason requires him to stand with him and turn away from what he takes from the blame of morals. Otherwise, how does God know it? Does He know it as it is in Himself or as it is in the knowledge of this scholar in his claim, and it is an issue?