Al-Sidr is the covering of infallibility. He said in the one curtain is forgiveness, and protect them from the torment of Hell. He said in the other covering, it is forgiveness and restrain the bad deeds, and there is another covering for forgiveness. So the curtain that separates the sinner and the torment is a covering of generosity, pardon, forgiveness, and transgression, and the covering that separates the servant and the guilt will cover that fear and divine providence. Please or modesty as

It came in Suhaib, yes the servant Suhaib, if he did not fear God, he would not disobey him

The reason for his infallibility from the existence of disobedience is his fear, and if it was not fear, then shyness from God Almighty would prevent him from using the tongue of what is called a sin against him, even if it was not a sin against him, because he was not established except for what was permitted to him. kill Hearts do not die unless without knowledge of God, which is called ignorance, because the heart is the house that God chose from this human upbringing for himself, so this usurper usurped him in it and prevented him from his owner, so he was the most unjust of people to himself because he deprived her of the good that would return to her from the owner of this house if he left it to him This is the deprivation of ignorance However, here is a joke that should be noted, and that is that the owner of the heart who sees that the heart is expanded by his Lord without the rest of his origin falls below the level of the one who sees that the truth is the essence of its origin without specialization, since the truth is his hearing, his sight and all his powers, so he is singled out from him with something without something. The heart monitors his heart, and the owner of the other state judges by his Lord over everything in which his Lord has hidden from that thing, and he is witnessed by the owner of this attribute in that concealment, so he treats him with what is revealed to him, and if he is revealed to him by revealing it, he will take care of the truth with this hidden from him, reveal it to him and express to him about himself and made him know what is the truth from him, and if it was revealed to him to keep the veil over him, he kept it and did not reveal to him anything of what is in himself over him this concealed, so the owner of this characteristic judges the owner of the heart, and the owner of the heart does not judge him for his preoccupation with guarding his heart, which is the house of his Lord, so that no one but his Lord enters into it, for he is the Guardian The gatekeeper, and if you understand this, see which of the two men they are Are the watchers still in the veil from disposition in the universe and they are the people of the limits in God, if they rise from monitoring their hearts, then it is the greatest veil, and if they go beyond monitoring their hearts watching the whole world, the space is wide for them, but they do not have the rule of the owner of that description that we mentioned, they are watching him because he is watching them because Over everything there is a watcher, so they contrast memorization with memorization, in contrast to proverbs with equilibrium and conformity. There is fear on that road that there will be an obstacle that prevents the traveler in it, for it is a behavior in which there is no supervision, and this house of science includes the knowledge of concealing the veils, and for the one who goes into hiding, he may loosen the concealment in the direction of veneration, such as the veil and the veil behind which the king or the drug is behind. Curtains fall as a mercy to those who fall below them, like divine veils between the world and God, keeping them lest the Face Glory burn them. It is for the knowledgeable person to differentiate between the reality of speech and what is spoken by him who has the quality of speech, so he knows that the composition is in what he speaks, not in speech. Which is the epithet of the acceptor, and does acceptance vary for the diversity of the acceptor, or does the acceptor have no effect on it, and in it is the knowledge of the divine limits. Why does it refer to it in itself or to God or to the possibilities that are the world and in it there is knowledge of the attributes of the disputants who know the truth and conceal it like the jurists who adhere to a doctrine they do not believe is correct? So they discuss it with their knowledge of its falsehood, and the opponent who is in opposition to it comes with the truth against its falsehood, and this other one knows that the truth is in the hands of its owner, and he rejects it and the falsehood appears in the form of the truth with knowledge of it. On the Day of Resurrection, do they have a divine document or not in which there is knowledge of the difference between denial, denial and lying, and is all of this a nihilistic or existential matter? b nothingness is it

In the rank of non-existence that does not accept existence, and is there a rank for non-existence that does not accept existence in proportion to what it indicates and then non-existence only and accepts in relation to an existential rank, or is it in the rank of non-existence that accepts the attribute of existence