If the affection was in the kinship that the Messenger of God, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, asked from us, intending kinship by means of it, what the truth denied about it in his saying that they have affection for those who oppose God and His Messenger And he greeted the rest of the Messengers, peace be upon him, with what God gave to his nation in their affection for kinship, and his nation was distinguished over all other nations by its merit in that, because the virtue of increasing and increasing was the best nation that was brought out for people. By God, this nation was singled out for matters that were not restricted to a nation among the nations, and it has rewards for the works it was designated for, which was not used by other nations, so they were distinguished by that on the Day of Resurrection and their merit appeared. For him and for the deeds they did for creation, caring for the truth, such as pardoning those who pardon people, and for creation there is a reward for creation by enacting the truth

His ruling on that, and the one to whom the matter comes to in this matter is that the wages fluctuate between the right and the right. There is no entry for creation in that except that they are a way for the emergence of these wages. If the creation had not been found in that, then no rule would appear for the rent or the exact wage. Therefore, the wage was a reward according to agreement, because the lessor is right and the lessor is right. A right, as there is no worker except the Creator of action, and He is the Truth, and creation is action, and in it is the appearance of action, so he crowded and inserted himself in that, and the Truth confirmed it over this competition and before it. This house of sciences, including the science of the rewards of creation without the truth, and it contains the science of connection with who and separation from who and separation and connection with whom, and it is a strange science that includes all existence and other than existence. It is subjective and unlikely. So whoever knows this knowledge knows where it was and who separated and who contacted it, and it has the knowledge of analogy in meanings to occasions, and in it is the knowledge of order in timing, and it is related to the knowledge of fate and destiny, and in it is the knowledge of kingship and ownership. Pray, or their rulings differ, and in it there is a knowledge of what distinguished the world of the pillars from the world of the other spheres. This transfiguration is in the natural forms that appeared without nature and did not appear in the world that is above nature and appeared in the divine transfiguration, and his ruling of racial transmutation appeared in the objects of his images and in his images, but not in his images. Contrasting Is knowledge of it lacks knowledge in contrast, or is each one unique in knowing himself without knowledge in return without stopping on it? And the polytheists in divine protection, and is that a matter of taking care of creation, even if they are ignorant, or is it a matter of giving the facts in that the matter is only like this, except that it is a matter of care, and we have it as a matter of taking care of the divine informing of that by way of God? Water, not by declaring, because this is from the knowledge of secrets that do not spread in general, but have people that the scientist must reveal to his family, for if he does not give it to his family, then he has wronged both sides of knowledge and who is worthy of it. It is compound and uncombined, and in it there is a knowledge of the division of the oppressors, who helps them from those who do not, and why does injustice return to its existence?

And in it there is the knowledge of the difference between life and the living, and if the living happen with what happens, is it with the old life or then an accidental life that appears with the revival in the living, and in it there is the knowledge of going back from who and to whom and relying on what is, and on whoever has knowledge of what God created the creation, did he create it in something or create it not In something, then the eye of the creatures is the same as their beings, and in it is the knowledge of the participation of truth and creation in existence and all that they share in it. One to wisdom and the other to wisdom