All faces, then, the names are not intelligible except by the intelligibility of lineage, and the lineage is not intelligible except by the intelligibility of the manifestations expressed in the world. reasonable judgment

[ One Sunday is the first of the names ]

If this is proven, then the one who says what is the beginning of the names is the one who says what is the beginning of the lineage and the lineage is a reasonable matter that does not exist between two people. The beginning of the nouns means what is the first of the nouns. Let us say the first of the nouns is the One Sunday, which is a single compound noun, the compound of Baalbek, Ramhamuz, and the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful. And it is not more specific in science than the One Sunday, because it is a subjective name for it that gives it this word by virtue of conformity

[ God is a name for the rank and not for the self ]

If you say, God is more primordial than the One, the One, because God is described as the One and the One is not described by God. God is the first of the Names, and only the One remains, as nothing can be understood of it except the eye without a structure. It is not compound, since if it was a compound, then the name of the one is not correct, nor is the thing on it true, then there is no likeness of it and no similarity to it that distinguishes it from its personality.

[ Fixed objects and their attribution to the first names ]

Nevertheless, we have decided that the names are a lineage, so what is the affinity of this first name and it has no trace of it that it requires, we said, as for the proportion that necessitated this name for it, it is known, and that in contrast to its existence there are fixed objects that do not exist except by taking advantage of the existence of the truth, so its manifestations are in that characteristic of existence. And they are objects for their own sake, they are not objects of a cause or a cause, just as the existence of the truth for its own sake is not a cause, and as the richness of God Almighty is absolutely, the poverty of these objects is absolutely to this rich, the duty, who is rich in his own soul. Participation occurs in it, so it is not correct for every eye of it to name the One Al-Ahad because of the participation and the homosexuality. That is why we called this rich Self at all with the One Al-Ahad because there is no existence but it. It is the essence of existence in itself and in its manifestations. Nor can she

[ Al-Wahhab is the first name to appear in fixed objects ]

But if his saying is what the names begin with meaning what the names begin with from the traces in these objects, then this question asks for two things: the one command is what it begins with in every eye, and the other command is what it begins with absolutely in the sentence, and its meaning is what is the first name that asks for its effect to appear in these objects So know that that name is Al-Wahhab, especially in general, and in one eye, there is no difference. The Almighty is the cause of something, because the cause seeks its effect just as the effect seeks its cause, and the rich is not characterized by the request, then it is not correct to be a cause, and the gift is not like that. Al-Wahb is giving existence to every eye, even describing it with what its own eye does not fulfill. that asks for food She is a deity, so the names of transcendence are like Al-Ghani and Al-Ahad, and what is correct to be unique to him, and the names of analogies are like Al-Rahim, Al-Ghafoor, and everything that a servant can be described in reality in terms of what is apparent and not in terms of his own eyes, because if he were characterized by him in terms of his own eyes, he would have the Rich and no need for him at all.

[ objects that are manifestations from which the name of poverty does not disappear ]

If these objects that are appearances are characterized by the likeness of the rich and are characterized by richness, then the meaning of that being rich in God above other objects, not that the eye is rich in itself, and so is every name that is honorable, then it has these names in terms of what they are manifestations. The Essence is from the tongue of the Manifest, so if it is called the Rich, then the Manifest does not depart from it