So the questioner said, Does it have anything else? He said, No, except that he voluntarily and combined his prayer between aloud and secret, I mean in recitation, and he also combined speech and action, the situation, and divinities in movements, such as standing, bowing, prostrating, and sitting, and he praised those who brought them. And reverence in her and gave her day and night so that time would pervade her blessing. Dust like Adam and water like the children of Adam. He said, 'Your creation is from dust, and from water, and from clay, which is mixing water with dust. The oneness of the divine plurality because of what it is of the beautiful names and the various rulings in that each divine name denotes the Essence and the meaning of what is the other meaning that the other name denotes. Have this faith, otherwise he is not the believer on whom God wrote this prayer, rather he wrote it on the believer, not the scholar, for the generality of faith. It removes the news from its possibility by looking at the same news, for he knows the truth of this particular report, because if the news necessitates the possibility, then it must be in itself described by one of the two possibilities, either true or false, and what it is of these two descriptions is not known except with evidence. By the scholar that he is truthful, not false, I mean this particular report and imitate it in this believer's belief. This news, so everyone subscribed to the description of faith. If God had written it on scholars rather than believers, it would not be obligatory for imitators and scholars to have the attribute of faith, so it was written on the general description, and had it not been for the truth, the Most High, would not have been revealed to His servants, He would not have described them with knowledge of it or with faith, so they are more deserving of knowledge of it than the Because the knowledge of creation is a knowledge of necessity and a subjective lack of what it gives the possible of reliance on the likely, so we know it by descending to us, so it appears by us and we are not able to show it, so the Almighty combines the epithets of the masters and the servants, and the servants are not able to be lords in themselves, even if they appear with the attributes of their master, but our words In the same matter, not in what they find at times. So what is God s, is known from the division, and what is for the servant is known, and what is shared by God is for God in the same way of sharing. Words denoting participation, but in the same matter, there is no participation in any way, for each one is entitled to his assigned share. He performed his prayers on time and did not see or produce knowledge of a secret

The fate that we have referred to in this book in many different places in strange ways, so he did not perform the prayer on time, and that is because God did not legislate these acts of worship to establish the emergence of its apparent image, but rather because of what it indicates and gives it from the side of truth from knowledge of it, even if the image has not breathed into it a life-giving soul. He does not breathe into it a soul except with the permission of his Lord, as He said, And when you were created out of clay like the shape of a bird, then every photographer participated in it.

Whoever looks like a bird and returns a bird, so is the work of a servant if he works with faith in that the truth commanded him to do that work, then he was authorized to create that image, the hypocrite participated as the photographers participated in creating from clay like the shape of a bird, for the hypocrite did not allow him to create the image of work on that limit And God did not command the creation of images of deeds except for the believers, so when the apparent sharing of the image occurred between the believer and the hypocrite, the believer breathed into it a soul by his belief in it, and it returned.