The speaking in this animal boat is nothing but walking with it on the straight path that the truth has designated for it. It is intended to disobey, and disobedience does not violate the sanctity of Sharia, but rather it takes place according to its nature, because it is not aware of the law, and it is agreed that it is in a mood that does not agree with its rider on what he wants from it, and the speaking soul is not able to violate it because it is from the world of infallibility and pure souls. The passenger hits his animal if it becomes wild and it goes off the road that its owner wants to walk on. Do you not see the limits in adultery, theft, fighting and slander, but the animal and physical soul that feels the pain of killing, cutting the hand and hitting the back, so the limits are set on the body and the pain is the sensitive animal soul that meets in it All animals are sensitive to pain, so there is no difference between the place of torment from the human being and between all animals in this world and the hereafter, and the soul that speaks on its honor with its world in happiness Ha standing

Do you not see to the Prophet, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, who stood up for the funeral of a Jew, and it was said to him that it was the funeral of a Jew? Then he, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, said: Is it not a soul?

What caused other than herself, so he stood in veneration for her and glorification of her honor and status, and how she does not have honor while she is breathed from the Spirit of God. For you that the speaking soul did not disobey, but the animal soul did not help it in what you asked of it, and that the animal soul was not engaged in an assignment, so it is characterized by obedience or disobedience, so agree.

[ That the divine generosity is still grateful to the dignitaries by creation ]

And know that God Almighty is still looking at the objects of possible things when they are not, and that the divine generosity continues to be grateful to them by creation over what was previously known of some of them taking precedence over others in existence by creation. What is not self-sustaining from it, the divine protection still preserves its survival by it, and it is in itself that it does not accept survival except for the time of its existence, so the divine generosity still exists for this essence the whole that God opened

In it are the images of the world, with its permanence of conditional possibilities, so God is always a creator and a preserver for him always, as well as the Almighty, had it not been for him to be captivated by the secret of life in the beings, it would not have spoken, and if it were not for the flow of knowledge in it, it would not have spoken praise to God who created it. He does not glorify Him with His praise, then he came with the word unacceptable and he did not single out anything that is stable from an existing thing because she accepted the objectivity of existence as it was in the state it was in regarding the objectivity of the affirmation. No, it is attributed in the absence of it to the epithets that, in the case of its existence, have what the Truth described by what He described it with from that, and He is the Truthful One who informs the facts of things as they are. What is with its permanence, so everything that exists on the objects existing by themselves is subjective to them, even if the symptoms are changed by proverbs and opposites. Nothingness has an intrinsic quality, so in the event of its non-existence, the possibilities remain looking at the truth in what they are in the conditions they are. Nothingness, rather, the matter that it is in itself is fixed, for if it were to disappear, it would not cease to exist except for existence, and it does not cease to exist unless the existing eye is characterized by this possibility of existence. And what the judgment should be upon the creation, and what the Creator should be described with, for there is nothing like Him, and every day it is in a matter, so nothing is similar to it, nor is there anything that exists. Staying with him and that asceticism in things does not occur except from the existing ignorance of this ascetic, which is lack of knowledge, and from the veil that is over his eyes, which is lack of knowledge.