He teaches them what is best in him from these actions and what is more beloved to him. What they disputed, and if they revealed the connection of the degrees of heaven to these actions, they would have judged virtue for the highest of them, but God Almighty is unseen from them, so in this matter they are in the status of human scholars if they sit in a council of debate among themselves on an issue of menstruation that does not They have a share in it unlike the issues in which they have a share, but we said that because the expiations are only to thwart the orders and prohibitions in which the taxpayer has violated his Lord and the angels. They are obedient, and they have no precedence in the works of expiation, so they quarrel about what they have no precedent in, as well as what remains of the works in which they have no precedent, so they are purified, so they are not purified, so they are not distinguished in their purification by eloquence and eloquence in that and other than swearing. I said, for they seek the gatherings of remembrance, and they say to one another, Come to your desire.

[ Remembrance is what is the essence of prayer ]

So know that the remembrance is what is the essence of prayer, and we are only talking about a special action in the congregation in which they do not have access to the same as that of the children of Adam, for they are not in the image of the children of Adam in particular, but they have the form in them. A tale that he tells to teach and define the times. As for commenting on the effect of the prayers, that is for the worshipers on this special body that is not for the angels, so they did not dispute about a matter that is their character, so we hit the issue of menstruation as an example, and the reason for that is that the angels call the children of Adam in their death to righteous deeds and desire them for the best, so I argued about the best until You order them to do so, and after we have informed you of the reason for the dispute, then let us explain to you what they have disputed about

[ Indeed, expiations are only prescribed to be a veil between the servant and the calamities that befall him due to transgressions .]

Know that the expiations are only prescribed to be a veil between the servant and the calamities that he presented himself with by the transgressions that he did as he was ordered to do that work or forbid him to do so. Al-Ghafar is the ruler of these expiations, but the affliction did not find an outlet, and the threat was not implemented in it due to the prevailing power of this act called penance and concealment of unbelief.

He, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, referred to that when he said about the adulterer that faith comes out of him until it becomes on him like a canopy, and when he takes off, faith returns to him.

This is because the adulterer or the offender in the case of adultery is required by calamity and punishment from God either in the case of adultery or its aftermath. The adulterer is like a canopy, and he is a strong veil, so he cannot influence with him or reach him. He added to that a degree in Paradise or a rank, so it is what came out in that action from the limit of it being an expiation, and expiation does not raise degrees, rather it is the capitals of these definitives. It includes different movements, and each movement has a special affliction from God, so this act of expiation for him in every affliction required by the transgression is a veil that conceals him from reaching it and affecting it. then The action was indivisible, like repentance, which is expiation. The particular affliction that this repentance pays is a single affliction that is neither enumerated nor numerous, for divine matters take place on divine scales that God has placed in the world, especially in punishments, so do not be trivialized in them at all. It is a disobedience of different expiations, such as the pilgrim shaving his head due to an injury he finds, or the one who enjoys enjoyment, or the appearance, or one who swears an oath and sees something better than it. The expiation in it is like the expiation for all other sins, so the angels speech is imagined, i.e., the atonement of the choice is more appropriate to do, or why is it an expiation, and he did not do something for which the punishment is obligatory or directed, so that this expiation would pay him off, so about anything that he conceals, then the Most High are quarreling in the like of this also, for the scholar is the owner.