They have something about them, so they turn to God to raise them, because of that hidden reality in them, in a situation where they are not under sensory compulsion from that face. Whoever is of their kind is a god, and his inability appears to them, and they persist in their transgression, as the Almighty said, in their tyranny, they blind them.

[ The evidence of God in His servants is of two kinds .]

And know that the evidence of God in His servants is of two types, one section is the true evidence, which is His saying, So whoever is on clear evidence from his Lord means in himself. In his case there is a clear verse that does not benefit him. Rather, it is imitation of the rulings that the Messenger brings, not of the evidence and evidence of his truthfulness. In what he claimed, I learned from this that a thing does not benefit you unless it is in you, and does not harm you unless it is in you. That is why we say in many of our words that the reality of torment is the presence of pain in you, not its causes, whether the reasons fall into you or someone else, so we do not say about things unless you stand up. It is for you, and the least of it is for you to believe in what the people of God s path realize that it is true, and if you do not taste it and do not disagree with them, then you will be on clear evidence from your Lord that they are truthful and with that evidence that you agree with them in that, you are among them in one of their drinks, for they are also among those who agree with each other In what they achieve in time, even if he does not perceive this in taste, what he perceives His love, so he acknowledges it and delivers it to him and does not deny it because the accusation rises, and sitting with these people for those who do not believe in them is a great danger and clear loss, as some of the gentlemen said, and I think it is good for those who sat with them and disagreed with them in something that they verify in their secrets, God removed the light of faith from his heart, so man remains in the situation which he is upon until the witness makes his departure from it, so whoever was in a state of concealment, he was in a state of concealment, and he who was in a state of revelation made manifest and disclosed. Witness, then good and more reassurance and self-strengthening in what is in his way, and if not, then his being aware of his Lord is sufficient. He is clear in himself from his Lord that he is truthful, but the judge asks him for a witness. why If the judge asks him for a witness and he brings a false witness and testifies to him that he is truthful in his claim, the plaintiff is aware of himself and his Lord that that witness who testified to him is false and he testified to falsehood and does not accept it in himself. That the matter is contrary to what he testified to, so we said that the witness we do not adhere to, as we did not accept him, nor did we verify his truthfulness or falsehood, except until there is a clear evidence from God in that, so know that.

[ Evidence is an ambassador from God to your heart ]

And know, after you have decided this, that the matter about which the truth is clear to you from Him is an ambassador from God to your heart. He who is hidden in his absence is reserved for you from the presence of the divine discourse. And the definition from God is that it is from Him. His nose is as the thinker does in his evidence, except that the thinker may take evidence that is not evidence in the same matter, and he may take evidence that is evidence in the same matter, but in view of the strength of the mind, he has given what is in his power, it is never in terms of reason except that that is evidence And he is a guide and the owner of the evidence from his Lord on a light from God and a straight path by which he does not know things except as they are. He does not accept resemblance except for resemblance to taste from his form, which he cannot confuse with, unlike the owners of ideas. With him and from him what he gives what is required for him and for others, and from him what is required for others and he does not give him what he does not have or to others, and what he gives is what he has a resident and what he does not have a resident, so the resident is like the residence and the non-resident is like the conditions. The influence of his whims, and some of them are not immune to the influence of his whims, even though each one of them The two sects have verified knowledge, so their clarification that they are upon is that he is infallible and that his desires have no way against him and that he is not infallible and that his desires have affected him due to the foregoing in God s knowledge of him. Does this knowledge benefit him with God in his happiness?