What the command necessitates in itself, and the divine news about God comes to the owner of this place with the epithets of the hadiths. So he stretches his leg this mind to make him drunk in a way other than his simplicity, so he falls into the truth with his drunkenness, and the truth excuses him for that because the drunk is not blamed for what he utters, so he stripped from God what the truth attributed to himself. From the mind, the mind is a creature, and the creature does not judge the Creator, for there is nothing made of it but its Maker is ignorant. The maker of it is not judged by anything, especially if the maker informs about himself about things, so the one who made it has nothing but to accept it. Mental sugar, natural sugar is the sugar of the believers, and mental sugar is the sugar of the knowers

And the sugar of Kamal remained from men, and it is the divine sugar

who

The Messenger of God, may God s prayers and peace be upon him, said about it: Oh God, increase me in you in confusion

And the drunk is confused, so divine drunkenness is joy and pleasure in perfection, and it may fall in the manifestation in pictures drunk in the right, some said

And the people got drunk like a cup *** and he was drunk from the director

Whoever is intoxicated by witnesses, he will not be awakened at all. And every condition that does not bequeath joy, simplicity, proof, and revealing divine secrets, is not drunkenness. Rather, it is backbiting, annihilation, or righteousness. The drunkenness of the people in the way of God is not measured by the drunkenness of the drinker of wine, for he may bequeath some of those who drink it with grief, crying and thought, and that is what is required by mood. That drinker and they call him drunk, and the like of this is not in drunkenness on the road, and few people distinguish between an animal and a drunk, and we have in the natural science that the drinker of wine, if it causes him grief, crying, sadness, thought, and cursing what his nature and mood requires, he is neither drunk nor a drunk, because some moods do not accept drunkenness nor It has an effect on him in it, for the absence of the drunk is not from his senses, but his absence from the opposite of joy and nothing else, and the analogous to those who do not enjoy the equivalent of those who have thought, backbiting and annihilation, and drunkenness separates from all other absences, because awakening is only from drunkenness and drunkenness precedes his awakening, and presence with absence is not like that, nor annihilation while remaining like that, but he Like being electrocuted while awake and sleeping with wakefulness, sleep takes precedence over alertness and trance takes precedence over awakening, but we mentioned this detail for the sake of their doctrine regarding the limit of drunkenness that it is backbiting with strong impulses, so they called it backbiting. He measures and errs in his upbringing of the disciple, if he is of the old, so the matter becomes confusing for him, so he does not differentiate in the case of the aspirant between his drunkenness, his absence, his annihilation, and the drunkard in this way does not lose his sense. He is right, and his drunkenness was not followed by a clear but rather he moved from a state of drunkenness to a state of annihilation or other conditions that are absent from some or all of it. In some issues, man brings together many things for facts that you demand of him, especially as some of those who were intoxicated by alcohol and passion chanted, saying:

Drunk, drunken passion, drunken drunkenness *** A boy wakes up a drunk boy

He told that he was drunk and drunk. Is God not like that, for knowledge prevents him, for the divine drunk is not able to have mental drunkenness, for witnesses prevent him from that and the drunk with mental intoxication is not able to him to be able to him natural drunkenness, for his evidence denies him, if he rejects a ruling

Divine drunkenness, so how can he accept the rule of natural drunkenness, but the drunk is from God s people, but he rises in his intoxication from drunkenness to drunkenness that does not combine them like what this poet said and what he cited on the road is only a person of measurement, not a person of taste. What is the matter with this drunkenness gradually a person may be endowed with sugar from the beginning, I mean divine drunkenness, so he cannot have the taste of sugar