And its existence indicates that if the Creator was not one, the existence of the world would not be correct. This is the evidence of the truth in him on his oneness, and it matches the rational evidence in that. Indicating him in another way, and they criticized this connotation, so they combined ignorance in what the truth established as evidence of his oneness with bad manners. The evidence for what the truth indicates its oneness, and only the later theologians who looked into this matter went to this. As for the forerunners, such as Abu Hamid, the Imam of the Two Holy Mosques, Abu Ishaq al-Asfaraini, and Sheikh Abu al-Hasan, they did not deviate from this evidence and expanded on its determination and demonstrated its integrity in manners with God Almighty and knowledge of the significance of it.

[ The monotheism of God is a branch of proving His existence, the Exalted .]

And know that speaking about the oneness of God from his being a deity is a branch of proving his existence, and this is the chapter on monotheism.

[ Proof of the Oneness of God Almighty in the two ways ]

And we have two paths in his monotheism, the one way is to say to the polytheist: We have gathered in the knowledge that then he is specified and his same has been proven and the least of it is one. In both of them are gods but God, they would have corrupted this premise, and the other premise is heaven and earth, and by them I mean everything but God that has not been corrupted, and this is the other premise and the unit between the two premises, which is the link of corruption. If they agree in the will or disagree, even if they do agree, it is not impossible for the dispute to be imposed. Let us see which one of them will implement his will. If they differ in reality or an assumption in the will, then it is not free either that the possible rule of their will be implemented together, which is impossible because the possible does not accept the two opposites, or it is not implemented, or it is either implemented. The rule of the will of one of them without the other. If the rule of their will is not implemented, then neither of them is a god, and the preponderance has taken place, so one of them must be enforceable, and the other has failed to implement his will, so the impotence occurred, and God is not incapable, for God is the one whose will is implemented and He is the He is the One, He has no partner, and thus Al-Khalil, peace be upon him, inferred in the sayings, and gave him the consideration that the decline contradicts the preservation of the world. Of them there is a god, and this is the same way of saying the Most High: If there were gods in them except God, they would have been corrupted, and every evidence that does not refer to this meaning is not evidence. Then God Almighty said in this story of Abraham, and that is our argument we gave Abraham, and he had no other than this. Our monotheism, which is our saying, If there were gods in them except God, they would have corrupted. The wise person is not exposed to speech about himself except with news from him, and with the coming of the news, we are ignorant of the attribution of that judgment to him because we are ignorant of it. Rather, we believe in him based on what he said and on what he knows. No, this is a method that is close to most of the theorists. As for the monotheist with the light of faith that is more than the light of the mind, and he is the one who gives happiness, and it is a light that does not come from evidence at all, but rather from the providence of God for those who are found with him, and it is related to the truth of the informant in what he told about himself in particular, it is not related to faith more than this If the revelation related to the news is revealed by another light that is not the light of faith, but the light of faith does not separate from it, and that light is the one who reveals to him the oneness of himself and the oneness of every being by which he is distinguished from others, whether it is then an attribute in which there is a participation or not. On the authority of others, when he revealed to the servant this light the oneness of the existents, he definitely knew by this light that God Almighty has a oneness that belongs to him. My father's words