and his king

So he came with the word something and it refers to fixed and existential objects. So what is found of them is finite, and what does not exist is not described as finite. Then look at the true, authentic divine news, saying: If the first of you and the last of you and what has another, because the matter is infinite, the other does not appear except in what is found, then there is another. So the judgment of the other will depart from that and move to this one who found this way to what is infinite, and the matter may be limited to a special type like man, for the persons of this type are finite, not the persons of the world. In the confusion of a new creation, the eye of every person is renewed in every soul, it must be that, so the truth is still active in the possibilities of existence, and this is indicated by the different rulings on the objects in each case. That is the state whose passing and its demise is seen in what was seen from that. Then he said, And forget you and your madness, which is what you see and what you do not see. Blue came and it is a word of abstention for abstinence, meaning if this happened, the ruling would have been in it as he decreed it. The correct one is because that is the specific of his possession, so nothing has increased in his possession Rather, he accepts the increase in the possession of existence, and he only wanted the king of steadfastness, so the decrease and the increase in existence

Then he said, "If the first of you and the last of you, your people and your jinn were to have the most wicked heart of a man among you, that would not detract from my possession in the slightest."

How can it be deducted from it when everyone is his property?

Then he said, "If the first of you and the last of you, your people and your jinn were to stand in one place and then ask and I was given to each of them his question, that would not detract from my possession in the slightest."

Because the giver and the giver to him is nothing but the eye of his possession, so nothing departs from his possession except that his possession of it is what is described as existence, and from it what is described as affirmation. What happened from him in existence is what is lacking in affirmation, because he is in the affirmation of his being in the event of his existence, except that God clothed him with the state of existence himself. See what is related to it, for we know that the example is correct, for we know that from fixed objects that are characterized by existence, as we know that the stitched objects were attached to it from the sea in immersion, and the proportion of the water attached to the sewn from the sea is what is in degree like what of the fixed objects was clothed with the suit of existence. Because the pain is limited, it is taken by the number and the finiteness of its existence, and the fixed objects have no end, and what does not limit them, no limit can take it, and no number can count it, with the correctness of the example undoubtedly.

This is how Al-Khidr was likened to Moses by pecking a bird into the sea with its beak while it was on the edge of the ship. Al-Khidr said to him, Do you know what this bird is saying? Al-Khidr had given the bird s logic, so his pecking was a speech when Al-Khidr did not know that. Moses and Moses had knowledge that God taught him, but Khidr did not know him, with the great knowledge that each of them had.

And it is known that some of the water happened in his beak, so it happened with what Musa and Al-Khidr taught him of knowledge as a partnership with God in that destiny. What did not happen, because what did not happen from the Yam is infinite, and what did not come from knowledge to Moses and Al-Khidr is infinite, so the example was set in terms of what happened in particular. The one from whom it was obtained and the one who was described by it is not characterized as decreasing from it as much as what happened to the learner from it. Rather, it is with him as it is with the one who acquired it. But when that meaning appeared in two places, it was as if he had a participation in it. It is lit with endless flankers, and nothing is detracted from it. Rather, this happened with the willingness of the acceptor to accept and the readiness of the one who was taken from him not to refrain, and the lamp is a lamp as it is, and the world has been filled with a saddle as well as knowledge and learning. Rulings in the presence of the truth are added to it, such as loyalty, worship, questioning, and other things that are not appropriate There are many commandments if a person follows the conditions of himself with his Lord, and for this he described himself as having names and morals, and they are known to the scholars of drawings, their words and meanings, and to the people of God he is characterized by them until he called them from them.