If the self accepts one additional eye, it is permissible for it to accept many eyes additional to itself, so the ancients are innumerable. This is the doctrine of Abu Bakr ibn al-Tayyib, and the dispute over this goes on for a long time, and our method is not based on this, I mean, in responding to them and disputing with them, but our method is to explain the objections of each sect and from where they adopted it in Her solution and what was revealed to her. Does this affect her happiness or does this not affect the share of knowledge of God of the people of God’s path? We are not preoccupied with refuting any of God’s creation. Rather, perhaps he provides them with an excuse for that due to divine expansion, for God established an excuse for those who call upon another god with God with proof that He sees that it is Evidence for his claim. So, glory be to him, he said, “And whoever invokes another god with God has no proof for it

[ Good and evil and their attribution to God. ]

Among their origins is politeness with God Almighty, so they do not call Him except by what He called Himself, and they do not add to Him anything except what He added to Himself, as God Almighty said: Whatever good befalls you is from God, and He said regarding evil, and whatever evil befalls you is from yourself. Then He said, “Say.” Everyone in the presence of God said that about the two matters. If you combine them, do not say “from God” because of the wording, and know that the plural of the matter has a reality that contradicts the reality of each singular matter if it is isolated and not combined with anything else, such as the blackness of ink between the tannins and the vitriol, so God Almighty separated what is.