Concerning what is permissible stipulated in permissibility or permissible what is stipulated in prohibition for the sake of lust, given the reference in that to the saying of an imam who sees this despite his knowledge that the legislator decided upon the ruling of the diligent person and decided to accept the action of the heart for him if he acted upon it, and before the desire he knew that saying and did not act on it nor say And it was returned to him because of desire touching his heart, so something like this affects his purity, so he must perform ablution without disagreement among the people of heart. As for the apparent matter, we have a look into this issue and we have disagreed about it with the graphic scholars < h3 style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)" "> (Chapter on touching the penis) [Differences of scholars regarding touching the penis]
The scholars differed regarding it in three schools of thought. Some say that there is no ablution required, and I say so. And precaution is ablution in every issue in which there is disagreement, for precaution is moving to the place of consensus and agreement no matter what. He was able to do that, and those who say that it is ablution, and some people differentiate between touching it with pleasure or with the palm of the hand, and between touching it with the outside of the palm and without pleasure, and they decided on that.
(He arrived The ruling on that is in the inner) [the reason for the creation of beings]