As for the one who says there is no god but God with his wisdom, then he is the one who said it according to the opinion of the Lawgiver, where [Page 329 of the Cairo edition]

He was obligated to say it and ruled that he should say it. Had it not been for this ruling, he would not have said it on the basis of closeness to God, and perhaps if he had said it, he would have said it as a teacher or A teacher

[ The collective noun used to refer to all nouns ]

I entered upon our sheikh, Abu Abbas al-Uraibi, one of the people of the highest level, and he was reckless in mentioning the noun. God does not add anything to it, so I said to him, “My master, why don’t you say there is no god but God?” He said to me, “My son, the breath is in God’s hand, it is not in my hand.” So I fear that God will take my soul when I say “no” to Him, so I am seized in the loneliness of denial. I asked another of our sheikhs about that, and he said to me, “What my eyes have seen.” Nor did my ears hear anyone saying, “I am God other than God,” and I did not find anyone who denied it, so I would say as I heard him say, “God, God.” Rather, we worshiped this name in monotheism because it is the comprehensive name used to refer to all the divine names, and it has not been reported that any of the worshiped people participated in it other than other names, such as God and others, and with this. The extent of the statement is that if the legislator’s statement is said, faith is confirmed. Rather, the legislator said so that they say there is no god but God, and he did not say Muhammad is the Messenger of God, so that this testimony to monotheism includes the testimony to the message, for the one who says there is no god but God is not a believer unless he says it in accordance with the saying of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace.