In terms of its existence, the learned existence is what is apparent, and it is the basis of ruling on these entities, so he said: There is no god but God with his Lord. As for the one who says there is no god but God by describing his Lord, he saw that the Truth, Glory be to Him, in terms of His oneness and His essence, is what is called God and the Lord, so he does not accept the addition, and he saw that the name of God, Glory be to Him, is what is called God and Lord. The Lord requires the desired, and the name of God requires the divine, and he saw that when they benefited from it existence was established for him the name of the Lord, since the desired was seeking it. The desired is the basis in establishing the name Lord, and the existence of truth is the basis in the existence of the possible. He saw that there is no god but Allah, and the essence of the self does not seek Him, so he said, “There is no god but God” by describing the Lord. What we called him the Lord, so knowledge of us is the basis of our knowledge of him.

Peace be upon him says, “Whoever knows himself knows his Lord,”

So our existence is dependent on His existence, and knowledge of Him is dependent on knowledge of us, so it is a foundation in a face, and we are a foundation in a face. As for the one who said There is no god but God in his condition. He is the one who relies in his affairs on someone other than God. If he does not succeed in achieving what he sought to obtain from the one on whom he relied, and the doors are blocked in his face from all sides, he returns to God by necessity and says, There is no god but God in his condition. And all of these types are not characterized by faith because it is what is in them. Who said it about imitating