A subject and he was neither a subject nor an object when he did not name his subject, because it is not valid for him to be a subject for his statement about which there is no doubt. If he were a subject, there would be uncertainty because the subject is just him. So how can something that is not attributed to him be attributed to him because the position of the subject also prevents that, for it is one of the facts that was and is not. Something with it, and for this reason it is not connected to the letters if they are preceded by them, such as the alif and its sisters, the dāl, the rā’, the zaī, and the wāw. Also, an object whose subject is not named is not said in it, because it is necessary for it to be preceded by a word with a specific structure, the place of which is grammar and the book. Here is the same verb and the verb, there is no subject or object in it, and it is in the nominative case. It remains only for it to be a beginner, and the meaning of a beginner who did not know anything else from the beginning. Am I not your Lord? They said, “Yes.” If it is said that it is necessary for every beginner to work in it initially, we say, “Yes, he worked in it.” The mother of the Book is the beginning that works in the Book and works in everything in truth. And God created the Lord, and that is why God alerted us. Blessed and Most High said, “Be grateful to me and to your parents for your polytheism.” Then He said, “To me is the final destination,” and He singled out, so gratitude is from the position of separation. Likewise, you should thank the robe because it was a cause that led to the wearer, and the destination is from the robe, and from you to the wearer, each one in his own way arrives, so you can understand.