Some say that it is obligatory to include it in the bath, and some say that it is not obligatory , and there is no disagreement among those who say that it is not obligatory regarding the desirability of including it in the bath .

[ Washing the hands with generosity and the arms with trust ]

I say, after stating the apparent ruling that we worship God, that washing the hands and arms, which are the wrists, so washing the hands with generosity And generosity, generosity, altruism, gifts, and fulfillment of trusts, and he is the one for whom altruism is not valid. He also washes them with the arms by holding fast to the elbow by trusting and supporting him, for the believer is dear to his brother, for when the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, used to wash his arms during ablution, he would go past the elbows until he began the upper arm, and this and similar ones are among the adjectives. The hands and the difference in the limit of the hands is most to the armpits and least to the part from which it is called the arm, so the introduction of the companions remains

[ The companions or seeing the causes as a companion and harmony ]< /H3>

And the companionship in the interior is seeing the reasons by which the servant is comforted and comforts himself, for man, in the origin of his creation, was created with fear and fear of poverty, which his reality gives him from [Page 340 of the Cairo edition]

wherever he is able, so he deviates. To what is convenient and inclines to it. Whoever sees the inclusion of facilities in his washing as obligatory, sees that the reasons were placed by God out of His wisdom in His creation, when He knew of the weakness of their certainty, so he wants not to disrupt God’s wisdom, not in the way.

---

---