A man who is harsh in his judgment on the news, and as for anything other than that, it does not exist, and despite this, no disagreement or agreement with what we mentioned has reached me from any of them

[ The Problem of Divine Attributes and Names ]

Also among the origins of this class is that it speaks what it hears and no one else says that in terms of taste, but those who say it in terms of rational evidence may say that. These people take it from divine manifestation and others take it from correct consideration. It agrees with the matter as it is, which is the truth, and the difference occurs in the path, then this path is different from this path, and if they agree on the point, which is the goal, then he is the Hearer for himself, the Seeing for himself, the Knower for himself, and so on with everything you call him, describe him, or describe him if you are one of those who misbehave with God, where he uses The word is an adjective for what is attributed to him, or the word is an adjective, for he only gave it the word a name. He said, “Glorify the name of your Lord, and blessed be the name of your Lord. And to God belong the best names, so call upon Him by them.” And he said regarding the polytheists, “Say, ‘Name them.’” And he did not say, “Describe them, nor call them.” Rather, he said, “Glory be to your Lord.” With glory beyond what they describe his feat It is different from the description in word and meaning: If you are one of the people of good manners and discernment, then this is the meaning of my statement: If you are one of those who behave poorly with God.

[ The Ash'ari doctrine in The Essence and the Attributes ]

And the one who opposes us says that He knows with knowledge, determines with power, sees with sight, and so on with everything He is named except for Attributes.