One, the viewer did not differentiate between them and did not distinguish which of the two thighs is the lam so that the other was the alif, so the writers disagreed about it. Some of them paid attention to the pronunciation, and some of them paid attention to the letter with which he begins his plan, so he put it first, so they combined to give the lam before the alif, because the alif is undoubtedly born from the lam, and so is the hamza. You recite the Lām in the example of His saying, “Because you are more fearful” and its likes, and this letter, I mean Lām Alīf, is the letter of ambiguity in verbs, so the apparent action at the hands of the created being is not clear to whom it is. If you say, “He is for God,” you are truthful, and if you say, “He is for the creature,” you are truthful. If not, the assignment and addition of action from God to the servant would not be valid . /p>

He, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, says, “It is only your deeds that will be returned to you.

And God says, ‘And whatever good they do, they will not make them ungrateful. Do whatever you want. Indeed, He sees what you do. And God says the truth. So also which of the two thighs made the lam or the alif true. And if the work differs in placing the form according to the scholars regarding it in order to verify it with the form, and everyone who indicates that the action is for one of the thighs and not the other, then that is incorrect, and the one who did it is interrupted and not proven, and other people from that matter disagree with him in that and indicate in his claim, and saying with him is like saying with his opponent, and the matter contradicts and is formed except Upon whom God has enlightened his insight and guided him to the straight path .