It is the one that came from the hadith, and it is the name of the verb. It means that standing is a name for this specific movement of this mover with which it is called standing, so that form is the one that is called standing in view of the state of its existence, and standing in view of the state of its expiration and nonexistence, and standing and standing in view of the illusion of its occurrence and not It is never found except in a vowel, so it does not stand by itself. Then he said, “The verb means the word ‘he stood and stands’” and not the same verb issued by the vowel “standing.” For example, a “ha” is derived from it. It is used to refer to the word of the noun of the verb, which is standing. It means “he stood up” and “stands up” from standing up, because the indefinite article with him is before the definite article, and the ambiguous is indefinite and the specific is definite. And the standing of unknown time, and the specific time standing up, even if it was entered into, and the specific time standing up, even if it were entered into, it would not. This is the doctrine of those who say by analysis that it is a branch of composition, and that the compound is found to be compound, and according to the doctrine of those who say by differentiation, and that composition is contingent, which is what supports the most in the matter of transmission, for what is most apparent is that knowledge is prior to The indefinite article, and that the word Zayd was used for a specific person, then the indefiniteness that he was Shurk arose in that word, so it was necessary to define it with an adjective, a substitute, and the like, so knowledge takes precedence over the indefinite article according to the investigators.