To it, by existence, the command to exist is directed to that eye when existence occurred, and the one who says that what is meant in the explanation of “Be not correct” is directed at that point.
« Issue” [The primacy of the necessity of existence due to others]
The reasonableness of the primacy of the necessary existence to something other than that which is negative in relation to the existence of the fact that absolute necessity is first for everything restricted, since it is impossible for it to have precedence there because it is not without it being such that absolute necessity exists, so it is either itself and it is impossible, or it exists in it and it is impossible for reasons including that it exists. By itself, including what is necessary for the absolute obligation, if this were to be performed out of lack, then it would either be evaluative in itself, which is impossible, or evaluative of its rank, which is impossible.
« Issue” [Primacy of the absolute obligation] h3>
The rationality of the primacy of the absolute imperative is a positive relation that is inconceivable to the mind other than the possibility being based on it, so it would be first according to this consideration. Even if it were decreed that there is no possible existence in force and in reality, the primacy relation would be non-existent, as it will not be found related.
« Question » [Our knowledge of God]
The most knowledgeable of possible things does not know their existence except from what He is, for Himself is knowledge .