From that, the meat was impure, and that is if it happened that he had a reprehensible character and was absent from the ruling of Sharia on him, which is his soul, then he was subject to death .

[ Abandoning punishment for a bad deed is an act of good morals ]

God Almighty said, “And the reward for a bad deed is an evil like it.” He said the same, and did not limit it in such-and-such a way, so He attached it to reprehensible morals. Then He said, “Whoever does not do it, then he who pardons and makes amends,” so he pointed out that abandoning the reward for a bad deed is an act of goodness. Morals, and that is why we said: “For what reason did his life go away, if slaughtering himself did not affect his purity ? ” p> The Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, said about the man who asked for retaliation against the murderer of his guardian. The Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, asked him to pardon him or accept blood money, but he refused, so he said, “Take him.” So he took him. When he stood up, the Messenger of God, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, said: “But if Killing him was like what He meant by the Almighty’s saying, “And the recompense for an evil is an evil like it.” That statement reached the man, so he returned to the Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, and refrained from killing him.

He bases on this the issue of good and evil, which is a big issue that people have delved into, and this chapter is not the place to explore. The truth of that is, even though we have mentioned it in this book

[ The wild animal is the eye that exists for itself, not by itself ]

The third One of the agreed upon impurities is blood