(Chapters on purity from impurity) [Opinions of jurists on purity from impurity]
Know that purity is two purities, purity that has no reasonable meaning, which is purity from The event that prevents prayer and purification from impurity, which is reasonable in meaning, as its meaning is cleanliness. Is it a condition for the validity of prayer, like the purity of one who has had impurity from impurity, or is it not a condition? Who says that purity from impurity is an absolute obligation and is not a condition for the validity of prayer? And who says that it is obligatory, like purity from impurity, which is a condition? Concerning the validity of prayer and those who say that it is a confirmed Sunnah and those who say that removing it is obligatory with remembrance is invalid due to forgetfulness .
Know that purity in our way is two purifications, an incomprehensible purity in meaning, which is purity from impurity, and impurity is a psychological description of the servant, so how can a thing be purified of its reality, for if it is purified of its reality, its essence is vanished, and if its essence is vanished, then who is responsible for worship and then no one but God, then for this. We said that the purity of the event is unreasonable