Rather, what excludes him from his imitation is the evidence of reason by which the law was established in his view, not this specific evidence. If the same event appears to him in what he believed in his imitation in that issue, he knows, therefore, that the legislator did not intend this apparent purpose in this issue, and he was alerted to that by the presence of this incidental evidence, which is It is in the same position as the presence of water, so this is the issue if you achieve it

( Chapter that everything done with ablution becomes permissible with this purity )

The scholars, may God be pleased with them, differed as to whether It is permissible to perform more than just one prayer. Whoever says that it is permissible, which is our doctrine, and what is better for him, is not permissible. And whoever says that it is not permissible, in contrast, branches out in that.

(arrived) Considering this internally

has already been mentioned in the repetition of the manifestation, and the discussion of the most important issues of tayammum has ended with brevity and brevity, and what the scholars have said about that. And God speaks the truth and He guides the path.

( The half has ended The first is from the first part of the Meccan conquests [according to the Cairo edition], followed by the second half, the beginning of which is the chapters on purity from impurity )

[ Page 376 of the Cairo edition ]

[ Page 377 of the Cairo edition ]< /p>

The Meccan conquests that God granted to the sheikh, the imam, the worker, the firm and the perfect, the seal of the saints and the heirs, the Isthmus of the Isthmus, the reviver of truth and religion, Abu Abdullah Muhammad bin Ali, known as Ibn Arabi Al-Hatimi Al-Ta’i, may God sanctify his soul and illuminate his shrine, Amen. The rest of the first part [Page 378] From the Cairo edition]