(clarification and completion) [Our doctrine is that opening the lam does not remove it from the anointed one]

As for the reading in his saying, “And your legs” by opening the lam and breaking it for The letter waw must be a conjunction of the anointed one with a lower case and the washed one with a fathah. Our doctrine is that the fatha in the lam does not take it out of the anointed one, so this waw may be a waw with the accusative wawaw in the accusative case, saying Zaid and Amr stood up, and the water and the wood were leveled, and what are you, and a bowl of porridge, and you passed by Zaid and Omar, you want with Amr, and likewise. Whoever reads, “wipe your heads and your feet with the opening of the lam,” then the argument of those who say by wiping in this verse is stronger because he shares with the one who says by washing the connotation that he considered, which is the opening of the lam, and he does not share with those who say by washing in lowering the lam. Among our companions are those who prefer the specific to the general, and among them are those who prefer the general to the specific, all of that absolutely.

[ Walking with the truth by virtue of the situation ]

And our doctrine is otherwise. We only walk with the truth by virtue of the situation, so we generalize wherever We generalize and specify where we specify, and we do not create a ruling, for whoever creates a ruling has created divinity in himself, and whoever creates divinity in himself has diminished his servitude to the extent of that matter, and if his servitude is diminished to the extent of that, he diminishes the manifestation of the truth to him, and if he diminishes the manifestation of the truth to him, his knowledge is diminished.