We say what this dissenter said in terms of proving the spiritual and moral origination, not what he disagreed with, and that the essence of a person’s death is his resurrection, but the minor resurrection
For the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, says, “Whoever dies, his resurrection has occurred ”
And the Resurrection The gathering of partial souls into the total soul. I say all of this, as the opponent says, and here his discussion of the resurrection ends. Those who say reincarnation and those who do not say it differ, and they are all rational people with insight, and they use as evidence for all of this the apparent meaning of verses from the Book and reports from the Sunnah. If we cite them and talk about them for a long time. The chapter is about engaging with them in verifying what they said, and none of them took any issue with that except that it had a valid and valid basis, and that the one who said it understood some of the meaning of the lawgiver and lacked knowledge of what others understood of proving the tangible presence in the tangible bodies, the tangible balance, the tangible path, and the tangible hell and paradise. All of that is true and greater. In power
[ Natural science does not deny the existence of natural bodies for an infinite period of time ]
And in natural science, the existence of natural bodies In the two worlds for an infinite period of time, but rather continuous existence, and that people only knew of the matter of nature to the extent of what the Truth made known to them of that, from what appeared to them in the periods of the movements of the spheres.