I mean the permissible thought is a specific attribute, such as laughter, for a person, and if it is not one of the established classes, then it is a formal necessary punishment, because it is a characteristic of the soul to repel harm and bring benefits, and this is not found in the sections of the rulings of Sharia law except in the section of the permissible in particular, since it is the one that is equal to doing and not doing, so there is no reward or burden in it. Sharia law, which is his saying, and what else is equality, which is moderation in a thing, so be like you, so your justice is a blessing to man, and there is no division in the rulings of Sharia law that requires justice and gives moderation, except for the permissible division, for it seeks it by itself and its specificity, so he did not describe it as inspiring it.
[ Who is the one who inspires the soul with its immorality and piety? ]
And what God Almighty has mentioned about inspiring it with immorality and piety, then the subject is implied, so it seems that the implicit pronoun refers to the implicit in something else, which is God Almighty, and whoever considers
the saying of the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, that there is a mark in man and that Satan has a mark
He means obedience, which is piety, and disobedience, which is immorality, so the pronoun is in, so he inspired it for the king in piety and for the devil in Immorality and he did not combine them in one pronoun due to the remoteness of the relationship between them, and it was all due to God’s decree and destiny, and it is not correct to say in this situation that God is the inspirer.