Onwards, since if it were, his essence would be composed of either of them or of them, and the composition in his case is impossible, so proving an additional, proven attribute over one is impossible

« Issue” [The negation of attributes and the negation of the eternity of torment]

Since the attributes are relative and additions, and lineage is nihilistic matters, and then there is only one essence in all aspects, therefore it is permissible for the servants to be merciful in the end of the matter, and the lack of mercy will not last for them to infinity. Since there is no compulsion for him to do that, and the names and attributes are not specific entities that require a judgment on him regarding things, there is no objection to mercy being inclusive of all, nor is there any objection to it. It has been reported that it precedes anger, so if the anger ends with it, the ruling is for it, so the matter is as we have said. That is why God Almighty said, “And if your Lord had willed.” [Page 164 of Cairo Edition] (If God had willed) He would have guided all of mankind, so the ruling on this will in this world was by obligation, but in the hereafter the ruling is based on His saying: He does what He wants. Who can prove that he did not want anything but that the torment would be eternally eternal upon the people of Hell, and it must be upon one person in the entire world until The ruling on the noun that is tormented, the affliction, the avenger, and the like is valid, and the noun that is afflicted and the like is a relative and an addition. There is no existent entity, and how can the existent entity be under the rule of what does not exist? So all of the aforementioned sayings of “If He wills, and if We will,” for the sake of this principle, has the absolute right, and then