What I have known is that I do not speak except according to the ear, and I will stick to what is determined for me. This and other writings of ours do not take the course of compositions, nor do we follow the course of authors, for each author is under his own choice, even if he is forced to choose it, or under the knowledge that he disseminates in particular. So he throws what he wants, holds what he wants, or throws what knowledge gives him, and the issue he is dealing with is judged by him until its truth emerges. And we, in our combinations, are not like that. Rather, they are hearts devoted to the door of the Divine Presence, watching for what the door opens to them, poor and devoid of all knowledge, if you ask in that place about something. What she heard was due to her loss of feeling. No matter what appeared to her from behind that veil, she hastened to comply with it and familiarize herself with it according to what was determined to her regarding the matter. The thing might be thrown into something that is not of its kind in habit and intellectual consideration and what apparent knowledge and apparent suitability of scholars gives to a hidden occasion that is not felt. But what is even stranger to us is that he delivers to this heart things that he is commanded to deliver while he does not know them at that time due to divine wisdom that is absent from creation. For this reason, every person who composes about recitation does not adhere to the knowledge of that chapter about which he speaks, but is included.