In it and its delay, it is a false illusion that has no reality. For this reason, we tended to indicate the creation of the world, contrary to what the Ash’aris tended to do, and we mentioned it in this commentary .
< h3 style="color: #FF0000">« Issue” [The Attachment of Knowledge] With the known]
The attachment of knowledge to the known does not necessitate the occurrence of the known in the same world or its example. Rather, science relates to information in the same way as the information is in its essence, existence and non-existence. Thus, the one who says that some information has four levels of existence in its existence: mental, physical, verbal, and written. If the mind wants knowledge, then he is a non-Muslim, and if the mind wants imagination, then he is a Muslim, but in every known thing he imagines in particular, and in every world he imagines, but this is only true in the mental in particular because it matches the eye in the image [Page 46 of the Cairo edition]
And the verbal and written They are not like that, for the word and the handwriting are subject to signification and understanding, so it does not descend from the point of view of the form to the form, for the verbal and written Zayd is only a za, yaa, and dāl in number or word, and he has no right, left, directions, eye, or hearing. For this reason we said, it does not come down to him in terms of the form, but in terms of connotation. Therefore, if there is a participation in it that invalidates the significance, we lack the adjective, the substitute, and the conjunction of the statement