With the permissibility of cleaning everything pure and impure, Al-Tabari was the only one to do so, not the group.
( Continued in considering what we mentioned in the subtext )
If it is valid to purify oneself from reprehensible morals and ignorance by anything, then it is valid by good character, or by another immoral character, and by honorable knowledge for the honor of what is known, or by knowledge other than that, which has no effect in the place except purification, then it is permissible to use it to remove this impurity, and to this is the opinion of Al-Tabari regarding what is anomalous in it without the group and from When removing it, take into account what is still in it, not what is still in it, and following the Sharia, and what the legislator has detailed in that, it is according to what is understood by the lawgiver in his jurisprudence in the religion of God, for the nature of people is different in understanding from God, and it is the subject of ijtihad, so he does not remove the essence of impurity except with what is most likely in his understanding of what is intended. The law is what it is and it is the first, and this applies to the apparent and hidden ruling equally, so it is needless to detail .