And poetry does not sense, it is not dead. Whoever sees its growth through food and its sense through the animal spirit are dead, whether he expresses life through growth or sense. And whoever sees its growth through his Lord, not through food, and his perception of sensible things through his Lord, not through the senses, has not paid attention to the intermediary because of its annihilation through the witnesses of the origin that is its creator, even if he sees that the truth is his hearing and sight. It is the essence of his senses, and it is not valid for him that he is dead at all, regardless of whether life consists of growth or sense. < h3 style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0)">( Chapter: Benefiting from the skins of dead animals )
So who Someone who says that the benefit from it is originally tanned or not, and someone who says that there is a difference between being tanned and not being tanned, and there is disagreement about its purity. Someone who says that tanning is a purifier for it, and someone who says that tanning does not purify it, but that it is used on dry land. Then those who said that tanning is a purification agree that it is a purifier for what Zakat is performed on it, meaning that it is permissible to eat from animals. They differed regarding what zakat is not performed on, so who says that