The tanner only purifies what is done by slaughtering, and that the tanner is an alternative to slaughtering in order to benefit from purity. And there are those who say that the tanner works to purify the dead animals except pigs, and those who say that the tanner purifies all the dead animals of pigs and other animals. < H3 style="color: rgb(255) 0, 0 ) ; /p>
( The consideration for this has reached the inner side )
We have known to you the name of the dead animal, so benefiting from its skin is not forbidden, which is the apparent use, so whoever takes into account the rulings According to the apparent meaning, without interpretation or deviation from the apparent meaning of the ruling indicated by the word, there is no objection to that, and there is no argument against us for anyone who says what is indicated by [Page 381 of the Cairo edition] some words from the simile, so we say what sided with the apparent meaning, for the apparent meaning was not brought by the simile, because the proverb The two adjectives are not apparent, so what is the error in the issue except in the interpretation and pronunciation if it is in this relationship with the pronunciation ?