He has tayammum, and if there is no water, he says, he does not imitate, even if he does not look at the evidence. If faith is mixed with the temptation of hearts, it becomes binding and it is impossible for it to be undone, and he does not know how it happened or how it is, so it is necessary knowledge for him. He has departed from the ruling of what imitation gives him, despite the fact that he is neither an observer nor a possessor of evidence, and so on. Most people in their beliefs consider the lack of water for this present person to be a lack of security for himself, lest looking at him lead him to doubt that he has departed from the faith. To Him is the fear of an enemy. )
The scholars differed regarding someone in this condition. Some say that it is permissible for him to perform tayammum, and this is what I say. And some say that he does not perform tayammum.
( His consideration has reached the subconscious )
Fear of searching for evidence to look into it to lead to knowledge of the meaning. Ignorance of the essence of the evidence that it is evidence. One of two things must be done. Either he imitates someone in that this is evidence of a matter that he assigns to him, or he lacks consideration.