The general public, while they do not realize it, is the sick person who finds water and is afraid to use it. In consideration
( Chapter: The present person lacks water, what is the ruling on it )
Who says that it is permissible? Tayammum is for it and I say it, and there is one who says that it is not permissible for a healthy present person to perform tayammum if there is no water
( this has been considered internally )
the present He is based on his contract that was imposed on him by his fathers and educators, then he reasoned and came back to himself and became independent. Should he continue with that contract or look at the evidence until he knows the truth? Whoever says that what his parents or educators raised him to do is sufficient for him and he is busy with work, because looking at it may lead him to confusion and he will not be safe from it, then he is the one who He said about tayammum when there is no water, and we have presented that water is knowledge to participate in life with it, so this present evidence is non-existent for him regarding the truth, for he does not see a correspondence between God and His creation, so creation is not a prevailing evidence of knowledge of the essence of truth, so it is better for him to remain in imitation of Him .
[ Not imitating the contract and not considering the evidence ]
And whoever says it is not permissible